Olympiad Maths Prep

Track / Stage 6 / 111 of 400 #1111 of 2000

Problem 1111

National olympiad, first round
Combinatorics Difficulty 6.1 Prove it

1. The natural numbers kk and nn are greater than 1. In a group of knkn people, each member of the group knows more than (k1)(k-1) times the remaining people in the group. Do there exist k+1k+1 people in the group who are pairwise acquainted with each other? (This needs to be proven for any kk and nn that satisfy the given properties).

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, read the official solution, then mark yourself honestly — the ladder only means something if the record is true.

Official solution

Solution. We will prove the statement using the principle of mathematical induction. For k=2k=2, the group consists of 2n2n people. Any person in the group knows more than (21)n=n>1(2-1)n=n>1 members of the group, so there are at least two people who know each other. Each of them knows more than nn members of the group. Let the set of people known to one of them be denoted by AA and the set of people known to the other be denoted by BB. Therefore, A>n|A|>n and B>n|B|>n. Using the formula AB=A+BAB|A \cup B|=|A|+|B|-|A \cap B|, we get

AB=A+BAB>n+nAB=2nAB |A \cup B|=|A|+|B|-|A \cap B|>n+n-|A \cap B|=2n-|A \cap B|

If AB=0|A \cap B|=0, then AB>2n|A \cup B|>2n, which is impossible. Therefore, AB>0|A \cap B|>0, i.e., ABA \cap B \neq \varnothing. This means there is at least one member of the group who belongs to both sets AA and BB. Thus, this person knows both of the selected members of the group. Since the two members of the group were chosen to know each other, we conclude that the trio knows each other. Therefore, the statement is true for k=2k=2.

Assume the statement is true for k=mk=m, i.e., in a group of mnmn people where each person knows more than (m1)n(m-1)n others, there are at least m+1m+1 of them who know each other pairwise.

For k=m+1k=m+1, let us have a group of (m+1)n(m+1)n people, where each of them knows more than mnmn people in the group. We will choose one member of the group, who, according to the assumption, knows more than mnmn members of the group. Therefore, we can select exactly mnmn members of the group whom he knows. From the new group of mnmn members, each of them knows more than (m1)n(m-1)n of them (from the original group, at most n1n-1 members with whom he is acquainted are removed, so he knows at least mn(n1)mn-(n-1) members of the selected group. Or from the group of mnmn members who are selected, each of them knows more than mnmn members of the original group of (m+1)n(m+1)n people. Since nn members are removed from the original group, he knows more than mnnmn-n members of the selected group). Therefore, in the selected group of mnmn members, each of them knows more than (m1)n(m-1)n of them. According to the inductive hypothesis, there are m+1m+1 people in the selected group of mnmn members who know each other pairwise. Together with the person initially selected, they form a group of m+2m+2 people in which any two know each other.

According to the principle of mathematical induction, the statement is true, i.e., in a group of knkn people where each knows more than (k1)n(k-1)n of the others, there are k+1k+1 members of the group such that any two of them know each other.

Source: NuminaMath-1.5, licensed Apache-2.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added by this site.