1. Initial Setup and Assumptions:
Given a,b,c∈Z+ such that (a2−1,b2−1,c2−1)=1, we need to prove that (ab+c,bc+a,ca+b)=(a,b,c).
2. Divisibility in One Direction:
Clearly, (a,b,c)∣(ab+c,bc+a,ca+b). This is because any common divisor of a,b,c will also divide any linear combination of these terms.
3. **Defining d:**
Let d=(ab+c,bc+a,ca+b). We need to show that d∣(a,b,c).
4. Divisibility by Linear Combinations:
We have:
d∣(a+1)(b+c),d∣(b+1)(c+a),d∣(c+1)(a+b)
We aim to show that d∣(a+b),(b+c),(c+a).
5. Prime Divisor Analysis:
Assume d has a prime divisor p. Consider p∣a+1. If p∣b+1 and p∣c+1, then (a+1,b+1,c+1)≥p>1, which contradicts (a2−1,b2−1,c2−1)=1.
6. Case Analysis:
- If p∣a+1 but p∤b+1 and p∤c+1, then p∣a+b and p∣a+c.
- Using a≡b≡−1(modp), we get p=2. Thus, a and b are odd, making c even, which contradicts p∤ab+c.
7. Contradiction and Conclusion:
- If p∣a+1, then p∤b+1 and p∤c+1, leading to p∣a+b and p∣a+c.
- This implies p∣(a+1,b−1,c−1), another contradiction.
8. No Prime Divisor:
Therefore, no prime p divides a+1,b+1,c+1, and thus d∣a+b,b+c,c+a.
9. Further Divisibility:
- d∣ab+c⟹d∣ab−b=a(b−1)
- Similarly, d∣b(c−1) and d∣c(a−1)
10. Prime Divisor Analysis Again:
- Assume p∣a−1. Since (a,a−1)=1, p∣d∣a(b−1) implies d∣b−1.
- Similarly, d∣c−1, contradicting (a2−1,b2−1,c2−1)=1.
11. Final Conclusion:
No such prime p exists, so d∣a,b,c. Hence, d∣(a,b,c), and therefore (ab+c,bc+a,ca+b)∣(a,b,c).
The final answer is (a,b,c).