Given a prime p, show that there exist two integers a,b which satisfies the following.
For all integers m, m3+2017am+b is not a multiple of p.
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, read the official solution, then mark
yourself honestly — the ladder only means something if the record is true.
Official solution
Given a prime p, we need to show that there exist two integers a and b such that for all integers m, the expression m3+2017am+b is not a multiple of p.
We will divide the proof into two cases:
1. **Case (i): p=2017**
- Choose a≡2017−1(p−1)(modp). This choice ensures that 2017a≡p−1(modp). - We want to choose b such that m3−m≡−b(modp) for all m∈N. - Note that 03−0=0 and 13−1=0. Therefore, the set A={m3−m(modp)∣m=0,1,2,…,p−1} has at least two repeated zeros. - Since there are p elements in the set {0,1,2,…,p−1} and A has at least two repeated zeros, there must exist an integer c in {0,1,2,…,p−1} that is not in A. - Take b≡−c(modp). This ensures that m3+2017am+b is not a multiple of p for any integer m.
2. **Case (ii): p=2017
- Claim 1:** The congruence x2≡−3(mod2017) has a solution in x. - Proof of Claim 1: (2017−3)=(2017−1)(20173) =(−1)22017−1(20173) =(20173) =(−1)22017−1⋅23−1(32017)−1 =(31)=1 Hence, the claim is proven. □
- Choose x≡y⋅2−1(−1+−3)(mod2017) where y∈{1,2,3,…,2016}. We know that −3(mod2017) is meaningful using Claim 1. - Observe that: x2+xy+y2≡(y⋅2−1(−1+−3))2+(y⋅2−1(−1+−3))y+y2(mod2017) ≡y2(−2)−1(1+−3)+y22−1(−1+−3)+y2(mod2017) ≡y2(2−1(−1−−3−1+−3)+1)(mod2017) ≡0(mod2017) - Therefore: (x−y)(x2+xy+y2)≡0(mod2017)⟹x3≡y3(mod2017) - Since x≡y⋅2−1(−1+−3)(mod2017), it is not hard to verify that x≡y(modp). - Consider the set B={m3(mod2017)∣m=1,2,3,…,2016}. Since we know that there exist x,y≡0(mod2017) with x3≡y3(mod2017), there must exist an integer k such that k=1,2,3,…,2016 and k∈B. - Now, choosing b=2017−k, we are done. ■
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.