Olympiad Maths Prep

Track / Stage 6 / 144 of 400 #1144 of 2000

Problem 1144

National olympiad, first round
Algebra Difficulty 6.2 Prove it

25.45. Prove that any (non-empty) bounded above set of real numbers has a unique least upper bound, and a set bounded below has a unique greatest lower bound.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, read the official solution, then mark yourself honestly — the ladder only means something if the record is true.

Official solution

25.45. Let's conduct the proof only for the exact upper bound. Let x0x_{0} and x1x_{1} be two exact upper bounds, with x1>x0x_{1} > x_{0}. Then for ε=x1x02\varepsilon = \frac{x_{1} - x_{0}}{2}, there exists xx (a number from the considered set) such that x+x1x02>x1x + \frac{x_{1} - x_{0}}{2} > x_{1}, i.e., x>x1+x02>x0x > \frac{x_{1} + x_{0}}{2} > x_{0}. But this contradicts the fact that x0x_{0} is the exact upper bound.

Now let's prove the existence of the exact upper bound. Construct a non-decreasing sequence {an}\left\{a_{n}\right\} and a non-increasing sequence {bn}\left\{b_{n}\right\} such that for each nn there exists xanx \geqslant a_{n} and no xbnx \geqslant b_{n}. Specifically, take a1a_{1} as any number from the considered set, and b1b_{1} as the number cc from the definition of a set bounded above. Let c2c_{2} be the midpoint of the interval [a1,b1]\left[a_{1}, b_{1}\right]. Take a2a_{2} as the number c2c_{2} if it fits; otherwise, take a1a_{1}. Take b2b_{2} as the number c2c_{2} if it fits; otherwise, take b1b_{1}. Subsequent terms are chosen similarly. The constructed sequences have a common limit x0x_{0}. It is easy to see that x0x_{0} is the exact upper bound.

CHAPTER 26

Source: NuminaMath-1.5, licensed Apache-2.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added by this site.