Let be a triangle. For a positive integer , we define on the segment such that and are defined cyclically in a similar manner. Show that there exists an unique point that lies in the interior of all triangles .
Problem 1653
Official solution
1. Define the sequence of triangles:
Let be the initial triangle. For each positive integer , define the points , , and as follows:
- is on the segment such that .
- is on the segment such that .
- is on the segment such that .
2. Nested compact sets:
Each triangle is a compact set, and the sequence of triangles is nested, i.e., for all . By the finite intersection property of nested compact sets, there exists at least one point that lies in the intersection of all these triangles.
3. Uniqueness of the intersection point:
We need to show that the intersection of all triangles is a single point. Assume for contradiction that the intersection contains more than one point. Then there exist subsequences of , , and (denoted again by , , and for simplicity) that converge to distinct points , , and , respectively.
4. **Case 1: , , and are distinct:**
Without loss of generality, assume . For sufficiently large , the points , , and are close to , , and , respectively. Consider the next triangle . The side is far from , implying that is outside . This contradicts the assumption that is a limit point of the sequence .
5. **Case 2: :**
In this case, (it tends to 0 as ). Applying the same argument as in Case 1, we find that cannot be a limit point of the sequence , leading to a contradiction.
6. Conclusion of uniqueness:
Since both cases lead to contradictions, the points , , and must converge to a common point . Therefore, there is a unique point that lies in the intersection of all triangles .
7. Interior of the triangles:
Finally, we need to show that lies in the interior of all triangles . Assume for contradiction that lies on some side, say , for some . Then would be outside , which contradicts the fact that is in the intersection of all triangles. Hence, must lie in the interior of all triangles .
8. Generalization:
The proof remains valid if we only require that , , and are on the sides , , and , respectively, and not too close to the vertices , , . Specifically, the distance from to both points and should be greater than for some fixed , and similarly for and .