1. Initial Setup and Inequality Transformation:
Given the inequality:
cyc∑xk+1+yk+zkxk+2≥71
where x,y,z are positive numbers such that x+y+z=1.
2. Applying Generalized T2's Lemma:
Using the Generalized T2's Lemma, we have:
cyc∑xk+1+yk+zkxk+2≥3k(∑cycxk+1+2∑cycxk)(∑cycx)k+2
Since x+y+z=1, the inequality becomes:
3k(∑cycxk+1+2∑cycxk)(x+y+z)k+2≥71
Simplifying, we get:
3k(∑cycxk+1+2∑cycxk)1≥71
which implies:
7≥3k(cyc∑xk+1+2cyc∑xk)
3. Defining Functions and Lagrange Multipliers:
Define the function:
f(x,y,z)=xk+1+yk+1+zk+1+2xk+2yk+2zk
and the constraint:
g(x,y,z)=x+y+z−1
Using Lagrange multipliers, define:
L=f(x,y,z)+λg(x,y,z)
4. Partial Derivatives and Equations:
Compute the partial derivatives:
∂x∂L=(k+1)xk+2kxk−1+λ=0
∂y∂L=(k+1)yk+2kyk−1+λ=0
∂z∂L=(k+1)zk+2kzk−1+λ=0
5. Equating Partial Derivatives:
From the partial derivatives, we get:
(k+1)xk+2kxk−1=(k+1)yk+2kyk−1
(k+1)yk+2kyk−1=(k+1)zk+2kzk−1
6. **Assuming x=y and Deriving Contradictions:**
Assume x=y:
k(xk−yk)+2k(xk−1−yk−1)=−(xk−yk)
Simplifying, we get:
k+xk−yk2k(xk−1−yk−1)=−1
1+xk−yk2(xk−1−yk−1)=−k1
xk−yk2(xk−1−yk−1)=−k1−1
xk−ykxk−1−yk−1=−2k1+k
This implies xk−ykxk−1−yk−1<0, leading to contradictions in both cases xk−1<yk−1 and xk<yk.
7. **Concluding x=y=z:**
Therefore, x=y=z. Given x+y+z=1, we have x=y=z=31.
8. Verifying the Equality:
Substituting x=y=z=31 into the function:
f(31,31,31)=3(31)k+1+2⋅3(31)k=3k1+3k−12=3k7
Thus, the inequality holds, and equality occurs when x=y=z=31.
The final answer is 71