Olympiad Maths Prep

Library / /12 of 21

, 2007

Algebra Difficulty 8.4 Shortlist Prove it IMO

Given a sequence a1,a2,,ana_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{n} of real numbers. For each ii (1in1 \leq i \leq n) define
di=max{aj:1ji}min{aj:ijn} d_{i}=\max \{a_{j}: 1 \leq j \leq i\}-\min \{a_{j}: i \leq j \leq n\}
and let
d=max{di:1in}. d=\max \{d_{i}: 1 \leq i \leq n\} .

a. Prove that for arbitrary real numbers x1x2xnx_{1} \leq x_{2} \leq \ldots \leq x_{n},
max{xiai:1in}d2. \begin{equation*} \max \{\left|x_{i}-a_{i}\right|: 1 \leq i \leq n\} \geq \frac{d}{2} . \tag{1} \end{equation*}

b. Show that there exists a sequence x1x2xnx_{1} \leq x_{2} \leq \ldots \leq x_{n} of real numbers such that we have equality in (1).

Solutions — 2

Solution 1

(a) Let 1pqrn1 \leq p \leq q \leq r \leq n be indices for which
d=dq,ap=max{aj:1jq},ar=min{aj:qjn} d=d_{q}, \quad a_{p}=\max \{a_{j}: 1 \leq j \leq q\}, \quad a_{r}=\min \{a_{j}: q \leq j \leq n\}
and thus d=apard=a_{p}-a_{r}. (These indices are not necessarily unique.)
Figure 1
For arbitrary real numbers x1x2xnx_{1} \leq x_{2} \leq \ldots \leq x_{n}, consider just the two quantities xpap\left|x_{p}-a_{p}\right| and xrar\left|x_{r}-a_{r}\right|. Since
(apxp)+(xrar)=(apar)+(xrxp)apar=d, \left(a_{p}-x_{p}\right)+\left(x_{r}-a_{r}\right)=\left(a_{p}-a_{r}\right)+\left(x_{r}-x_{p}\right) \geq a_{p}-a_{r}=d,
we have either apxpd2a_{p}-x_{p} \geq \frac{d}{2} or xrard2x_{r}-a_{r} \geq \frac{d}{2}. Hence,
max{xiai:1in}max{xpap,xrar}max{apxp,xrar}d2 \max \{\left|x_{i}-a_{i}\right|: 1 \leq i \leq n\} \geq \max \{\left|x_{p}-a_{p}\right|,\left|x_{r}-a_{r}\right|\} \geq \max \{a_{p}-x_{p}, x_{r}-a_{r}\} \geq \frac{d}{2}

(b) Define the sequence (xk)\left(x_{k}\right) as
x1=a1d2,xk=max{xk1,akd2} for 2kn. x_{1}=a_{1}-\frac{d}{2}, \quad x_{k}=\max \{x_{k-1}, a_{k}-\frac{d}{2}\} \quad \text{ for } 2 \leq k \leq n .
We show that we have equality in (1) for this sequence.
By the definition, sequence ( xkx_{k} ) is non-decreasing and xkakd2x_{k}-a_{k} \geq-\frac{d}{2} for all 1kn1 \leq k \leq n. Next we prove that
xkakd2 for all 1kn \begin{equation*} x_{k}-a_{k} \leq \frac{d}{2} \quad \text{ for all } 1 \leq k \leq n \tag{2} \end{equation*}
Consider an arbitrary index 1kn1 \leq k \leq n. Let k\ell \leq k be the smallest index such that xk=xx_{k}=x_{\ell}. We have either =1\ell=1, or 2\ell \geq 2 and x>x1x_{\ell}>x_{\ell-1}. In both cases,
xk=x=ad2 \begin{equation*} x_{k}=x_{\ell}=a_{\ell}-\frac{d}{2} \tag{3} \end{equation*}
Since
aakmax{aj:1jk}min{aj:kjn}=dkd a_{\ell}-a_{k} \leq \max \{a_{j}: 1 \leq j \leq k\}-\min \{a_{j}: k \leq j \leq n\}=d_{k} \leq d
equality (3) implies
xkak=aakd2dd2=d2 x_{k}-a_{k}=a_{\ell}-a_{k}-\frac{d}{2} \leq d-\frac{d}{2}=\frac{d}{2}
We obtained that d2xkakd2-\frac{d}{2} \leq x_{k}-a_{k} \leq \frac{d}{2} for all 1kn1 \leq k \leq n, so
max{xiai:1in}d2 \max \{\left|x_{i}-a_{i}\right|: 1 \leq i \leq n\} \leq \frac{d}{2}
We have equality because x1a1=d2\left|x_{1}-a_{1}\right|=\frac{d}{2}.

Solution 2

We present another construction of a sequence ( xix_{i} ) for part (b).
For each 1in1 \leq i \leq n, let
Mi=max{aj:1ji} and mi=min{aj:ijn}. M_{i}=\max \{a_{j}: 1 \leq j \leq i\} \quad \text{ and } \quad m_{i}=\min \{a_{j}: i \leq j \leq n\} .
For all 1i<n1 \leq i<n, we have
Mi=max{a1,,ai}max{a1,,ai,ai+1}=Mi+1 M_{i}=\max \{a_{1}, \ldots, a_{i}\} \leq \max \{a_{1}, \ldots, a_{i}, a_{i+1}\}=M_{i+1}
and
mi=min{ai,ai+1,,an}min{ai+1,,an}=mi+1. m_{i}=\min \{a_{i}, a_{i+1}, \ldots, a_{n}\} \leq \min \{a_{i+1}, \ldots, a_{n}\}=m_{i+1} .
Therefore sequences ( MiM_{i} ) and ( mim_{i} ) are non-decreasing. Moreover, since aia_{i} is listed in both definitions,
miaiMi m_{i} \leq a_{i} \leq M_{i}
To achieve equality in (1), set
xi=Mi+mi2 x_{i}=\frac{M_{i}+m_{i}}{2}
Since sequences ( MiM_{i} ) and ( mim_{i} ) are non-decreasing, this sequence is non-decreasing as well.
From di=Mimid_{i}=M_{i}-m_{i} we obtain that
di2=miMi2=xiMixiaiximi=Mimi2=di2 -\frac{d_{i}}{2}=\frac{m_{i}-M_{i}}{2}=x_{i}-M_{i} \leq x_{i}-a_{i} \leq x_{i}-m_{i}=\frac{M_{i}-m_{i}}{2}=\frac{d_{i}}{2}
Therefore
max{xiai:1in}max{di2:1in}=d2 \max \{\left|x_{i}-a_{i}\right|: 1 \leq i \leq n\} \leq \max \{\frac{d_{i}}{2}: 1 \leq i \leq n\}=\frac{d}{2}
Since the opposite inequality has been proved in part (a), we must have equality.

Looking for a route rather than an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.