First, we consider how we can obtain an operation that satisfies the two conditions of the problem. Let us begin with the following Lemma:
Lemma 1: For every pair of integers i and j with 1≤i,j≤6, i⋄j is the only integer which appears in both i-th row and j-th column.
Proof of Lemma 1: It is clear that the number i⋄j appears in both i-th row and j-th column. Suppose now that for some pair of integers j′, i′ both lying in between 1 and 6, some integer k appears in both the square located on i-th row and j-th column and the square located on i′-th row and j-th column, then we have k⋄k=(i⋄j′)(i′⋄j)=i⋄j, which implies that i⋄j is the only number that can appear in both i-th row and j-th column.
Next, we note that since for any choice of positive integers i,j,k lying in between 1 and 6 the identity
i⋄k=(i⋄j)⋄(k⋄k)⋄k
holds, we see that distribution of numbers in i-th row and (i⋄j)-th row must coincide. Consequently, for any pair of numbers i1,i2 lying in between 1 and 6, no pair j1,j2 exists for which i1⋄j1=i2⋄j2, if the distribution of numbers in i1-th and i2-th rows are different. In other words, for any pair of rows the distributions of integers in them either coincide or there exists no integer which appears in both rows.
On the other hand, for any integer i lying in between 1 and 6, i⋄i=i holds; therefore, in i-th row number i appears at least once. In view of this fact and the fact mentioned above, we can conclude that the set {1,2,…,6} of positive integers is partitioned into the collection I1,I2,…,Im, (where m is a positive integer ≤6), of non-empty subsets, which satisfies the following condition:
For any x∈{1,2,…,m} and for any i∈Ix, the set Ix coincides with the set of all numbers appearing in i-th row.
By considering columns instead of rows, we can also obtain the following:
The set {1,2,…,6} of positive integers is partitioned into the collection J1,J2,…,Jn, (where n is a positive integer ≤6), of non-empty subsets, which satisfies the following condition:
For any y∈{1,2,…,n} and for any j∈Jy, the set Jy coincides with the set of all numbers appearing in j-th column.
From Lemma 1 it follows that for any pair of numbers x,y with 1≤x≤m and 1≤y≤n, there is a unique integer belonging to the set Ix∩Jy. Denote this integer by (x,y). Then we can show the following:
Lemma 2: For any choice of x1,x2,y1,y2, (x1,y1)⋄(x2,y2)=(x1,y2).
Proof of Lemma 2: First, we note that for any pair i∈Ix,j∈Jy, (x,y)=i⋄j holds. Therefore, we see that for i1∈Ix1,i2∈Ix2,j1∈Jy1,j2∈Jy2, we have
⟨x1,y1⟩⋄⟨x2,y2⟩=(i1⋄j1)⋄(i2⋄j2)=i1⋄j2=⟨x1,y2⟩,
proving the Lemma.
Now, since both I1,I2,…,Im and J1,J2,…,Jn are partitions of the set {1,2,…,6}, we see that in the enumeration
(†)⟨1,1⟩,⟨1,2⟩,…,⟨1,n⟩,⟨2,1⟩,⟨2,2⟩,…,⟨2,n⟩,……⟨m,1⟩,⟨m,2⟩,…⟨m,n⟩,
Lemma 3: When positive integers m,n satisfying mn=6 and enumeration (†) above of the numbers 1,2,...,6 are given, assignment of numbers into squares to satisfy the statement of Lemma 2 is uniquely determined, and this assignment satisfies the conditions of the problem.
Proof of Lemma 3: First, we note that the two conditions of the problem can be stated in terms of ⟨x,y⟩ as follows:
∙⟨x,y⟩⋄⟨x,y⟩=⟨x,y⟩
∙(⟨x1,y1⟩⋄⟨x2,y2⟩)⋄(⟨x3,y3⟩⋄⟨x4,y4⟩)=⟨x1,y2⟩⋄⟨x3,y4⟩=⟨x1,y4⟩=⟨x1,y1⟩⋄⟨x4,y4⟩.
Since for each i lying in between 1 and 6, there is a unique pair x and y for which i=⟨x,y⟩, we see that the claim of Lemma 3 is valid.
Now if we consider an assignment of numbers satisfying the conditions of the problem, then there are m!⋅n! enumeration (†)'s giving this assignment corresponding to the number of permutations of sets I1,I2,…,Im and J1,J2,…,Jn. For each pair m,n satisfying mn=6 there are 6! different (†)'s, and therefore, the number of ways of assignments satisfying the conditions of the problem is m!n!6!, which yields
1!⋅6!6!+2!⋅3!6!+3!⋅2!6!+6!⋅1!6!=122