LEMMA. Dn,k+1Dn,k−1≤Dn,12.
Proof. By simple calculations we get
Dn,k+1Dn,k−1=x2n+y2n+xn+kyn−k+xn−kyn+kx2n+2+y2n+2+xy(xn+kyn−k+xn−kyn+k)
and
Dn,12=x2n+y2n+2(xy)nx2n+2+y2n+2+2(xy)n+1.
Letting A=x2n+2+y2n+2, B=x2n+y2n, C1=xn+kyn−k+xn−kyn+k and C2=2xnyn, and by clearing denominators the thesis becomes
(C1−C2)(A−xyB)≥0.
But here we have now C1≥C2 by the AM-GM inequality, and A≥xyB by the rearrangement inequality (or just some trivial factorization). □
Using the LEMMA with a telescoping product we obtain
Dn,n+1Dn,1−1=k=1∏nDn,kDn,k+1≤Dn,12n.
Substituting, our hypothesis corresponds to Dn,n+1≥1, and therefore
Dn,12n+1=(xn+ynxn+1+yn+1)2n+1≥Dn,n+1≥1,
whence the thesis.
Alternative Solution.
Suppose xn+1+yn+1<xn+yn. Then xy<1; otherwise (i.e. for xy≥1) we would have
xn+yn≤xn+21y21+x21yn+21<xn+1+yn+1,
absurd. The inequality xn+yn≤xn+21y21+x21yn+21 comes from 1≤x21y21, while the inequality xn+21y21+x21yn+21<xn+1+yn+1 immediately holds, by writing it (x21−y21)(xn+21−yn+21)>0.
Without loss of generality, we may take x>1>y>0 (the other cases are trivial). It follows that xk+x−k<yk+y−k for all k∈N∗. This comes from the function f(t)=t+t−1 for t>0 being decreasing on (0,1] and increasing on [1,+∞), while x∈(y,y−1).
From xn+1+yn+1<xn+yn follows xn+1−xn<yn−yn+1.
But then x2n+1−1=(xn+1−xn)(1+k=1∑n(xk+x−k))<(yn−yn+1)(1+k=1∑n(yk+y−k))=1−y2n+1,
this is to say, in the end, x2n+1+y2n+1<2, contradiction.