In acute triangle , denote by , , the lengths of the altitudes to bases , , , respectively. Point lies inside the triangle. Prove that
, 2010
Solutions — 2
Solution 1
Solution 1. We begin with a key lemma, for which we provide two proofs.
Lemma 1. Let , , , and let , , denote the distances from to sides , , , respectively. We have
First proof of Lemma 1. First, notice that , , and , hence we have
Let and be the feet of the perpendiculars from to sides and , respectively. (Thus, and .) Let points and lie on sides and , respectively, such that and lies on . We have and . Hence
Because and are similar, we have , hence the last inequality implies that
Let be the reflection of across the bisector of , and let and be the feet of the perpendiculars from to sides and , respectively. By symmetry, it is not difficult to see that , , , and . In exactly the same way we established (3), we can show that
Adding (3) and (4) together yields
establishing the lemma.
Second proof of Lemma 1. Set , , , and . Note that (1) is equivalent to
Further, we have that
and by the law of sines, so it suffices to show that
Indeed, by the sum-to-product formulas, we obtain
as needed.
We now proceed to the problem proper. By Lemma 1, we have
Likewise, we have
Adding the last three inequalities gives
by the AM-GM inequality and (2).
Solution 2
Solution 2 (by Gabriel Carroll). We start with the following observation.
Lemma 2. Let be a triangle, and let be the excircle opposite . Let and be the center and radius of , respectively. Then
(For a point and a line , denotes the distance from to .)
Proof. Fix the excircle and the two tangent rays from , and let and be variable points on these rays such that is tangent to the circle, and the circle lies on the opposite side of line from . Let the tangent ray from passing through touch the excircle at (and so ). Then we have
which is maximized by minimizing . Let be tangent to the circle at . As and vary, and are both constants, and
By the convexity of the tangent function, is minimized when ; that is, or is isosceles. Hence it suffices to prove our result in this case. We may set . Then , , , , , , , and . We need to show that
Now, notice that , so we have and . Thus, multiplying both sides of the last desired inequality by , it suffices to show that
or equivalently by the sine subtraction formula that . By the double-angle formula, the last inequality is equivalent to , or . The latter is equivalent to , establishing the result.
We now return to the original problem. Let , , be the excenters of opposite , , . It is well known that , , and are the altitudes of triangle . By Lemma 2, , implying that
Adding the last inequality and its cyclic analogs yields