Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Romania — NMO Selection Tests for the Balkan and International Mathematical Olympiads /70 of 80

Romania — NMO Selection Tests for the Balkan and International Mathematical Olympiads

Combinatorics Difficulty 8.7 Shortlist Prove it Romania

Given two integers h≥1h \ge 1 and p≥2p \ge 2, determine the minimum number of pairs of opponents an hp-member parliament may have, if in every partition of the parliament into h houses of p member each some house contains at least one pair of opponents.

Solution

Letting N(h,p)=(h−1)⋅min⁡(p,h/2+1)N(h, p) = (h-1) \cdot \min(p, h/2+1), we now proceed to prove by induction on hh that if the number of edges of a graph on hphp vertices does not exceed N(h,p)N(h, p), then the graph is hh-partite on pp-element classes. The base case h=1h=1 is clear.

Next, let h≥2h \ge 2 and let G=(V,E)G = (V, E) be a graph on hphp vertices which has at most N(h,p)N(h, p) edges. If necessary, add some extra edges to obtain ∣E∣=N(h,p)|E| = N(h, p).

Begin by forming a pp-element house V0V_0 of independent vertices v1,…,vpv_1, \dots, v_p by the following pp-step greedy algorithm: Start with the empty set, and at step jj choose a vertex vjv_j of maximal degree from the set of vertices joined by an edge to no viv_i, i<ji < j, and different from any of these; this set is nonempty, for if each of the remaining hp−j+1hp-j+1 vertices were joined by an edge to some viv_i, i<ji < j, then ∣E∣≥hp−j+1≥hp−p+1>N(h,p)|E| \ge hp-j+1 \ge hp-p+1 > N(h, p) — a contradiction. Notice that deg⁡v1≥deg⁡v2≥⋯≥deg⁡vp\deg v_1 \ge \deg v_2 \ge \dots \ge \deg v_p.

Let d=∑v∈V0deg⁡vd = \sum_{v \in V_0} \deg v, so the subgraph G′G' induced by the p(h−1)p(h-1) vertices in V∖V0V \setminus V_0 has exactly N(h,p)−dN(h, p) - d edges. If d≥ΔN=N(h,p)−N(h−1,p)d \ge \Delta N = N(h, p) - N(h-1, p), then G′G' is (h−1)(h-1)-partite on pp-element classes by the induction hypothesis, and the conclusion follows.

Henceforth, assume
d<ΔN={p,if h≥2p−1,h,if h≤2p−2,(∗) d < \Delta N = \begin{cases} p, & \text{if } h \ge 2p-1, \\ h, & \text{if } h \le 2p-2, \end{cases} \quad (*)
and notice that ΔN≤h\Delta N \le h in either case, so d≤h−1d \le h-1. Let V′V' be the set of all vertices in V∖V0V \setminus V_0 joined by an edge to some vertex in V0V_0, and notice that ∣V′∣≤d≤h−1|V'| \le d \le h-1, and deg⁡v≤deg⁡vp\deg v \le \deg v_p for all vertices vv outside V0∪V′V_0 \cup V'.

If deg⁡vp=0\deg v_p = 0, then the vertices outside V0∪V′V_0 \cup V' are all isolated. Since ∣V′∣≤d≤h−1|V'| \le d \le h-1, each vertex of V′V' may be included in a different pp-element house (other than V0V_0) along with p−1p-1 vertices outside V0∪V′V_0 \cup V' each, to obtain ∣V′∣|V'| more pp-element houses. The remaining vertices, if any, are then arbitrarily split into pp-element houses.

Finally, we rule out the case deg⁡vp≥1\deg v_p \ge 1. Suppose, if possible, that deg⁡vp≥1\deg v_p \ge 1. Then deg⁡vi≥1\deg v_i \ge 1, i=1,…,pi = 1, \dots, p, and d≥pd \ge p, so (*) yields ΔN=h\Delta N = h, h≤2p−2h \le 2p-2, and N(h,p)=(h−1)(h+2)/2N(h,p) = (h-1)(h+2)/2. Hence p≤d≤h−1≤2p−3p \le d \le h-1 \le 2p-3. The inequality d≤2p−3d \le 2p-3 forces deg⁡vp=1\deg v_p = 1, so deg⁡v≤1\deg v \le 1 for all vertices vv outside V0∪V′V_0 \cup V', and
∑v∈V∖(V0∪V′)deg⁡v≤hp−∣V0∣=p(h−1). \sum_{v \in V \setminus (V_0 \cup V')} \deg v \le hp - |V_0| = p(h-1).
Further on, split V′=V1∪⋯∪VpV' = V_1 \cup \cdots \cup V_p, where VjV_j is the set of all vertices joined by an edge to vjv_j, but to no viv_i, i<ji < j. Notice that ∣Vi∣≤deg⁡vi|V_i| \le \deg v_i, and deg⁡v≤deg⁡vi\deg v \le \deg v_i for all vertices vv in ViV_i. Consequently,
∑v∈V0∪V′deg⁡v=∑i=1p(deg⁡vi+∑v∈Videg⁡v)≤∑i=1pdeg⁡vi(deg⁡vi+1)=∑i=1p(deg⁡vi−1)2+3d−p. \begin{aligned} \sum_{v \in V_0 \cup V'} \deg v &= \sum_{i=1}^{p} \left( \deg v_i + \sum_{v \in V_i} \deg v \right) \le \sum_{i=1}^{p} \deg v_i (\deg v_i + 1) \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^{p} (\deg v_i - 1)^2 + 3d - p. \end{aligned}
Since deg⁡vi≥1\deg v_i \ge 1, i=1,…,pi = 1, \dots, p,
∑i=1p(deg⁡vi−1)2≤(∑i=1p(deg⁡vi−1))2=(d−p)2, \sum_{i=1}^{p} (\deg v_i - 1)^2 \le \left( \sum_{i=1}^{p} (\deg v_i - 1) \right)^2 = (d-p)^2,
so (recalling that d≤h−1d \le h-1)
∑v∈V0∪V′deg⁡v≤(d−p)2+3d−p≤(h−p−1)2+3(h−1)−p=(h−1)(h+2)+p(p−2h+1)=2N(h,p)+p(p−2h+1). \begin{aligned} \sum_{v \in V_0 \cup V'} \deg v &\le (d-p)^2 + 3d - p \le (h-p-1)^2 + 3(h-1) - p \\ &= (h-1)(h+2) + p(p-2h+1) = 2N(h,p) + p(p-2h+1). \end{aligned}
Hence, by the preceding,
2N(h,p)=2∣E∣=∑v∈Vdeg⁡v=∑v∈V0∪V′deg⁡v+∑v∈V∖(V0∪V′)deg⁡v≤2N(h,p)+p(p−2h+1)+p(h−1)=2N(h,p)+p(p−h)<2N(h,p), \begin{aligned} 2N(h,p) = 2|E| &= \sum_{v \in V} \deg v = \sum_{v \in V_0 \cup V'} \deg v + \sum_{v \in V \setminus (V_0 \cup V')} \deg v \\ &\le 2N(h,p) + p(p-2h+1) + p(h-1) = 2N(h,p) + p(p-h) \\ &< 2N(h,p), \end{aligned}
which is a contradiction. This ends the proof.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.