Let be a triangle with , and let be its -excenter. Let be the projection of to . Let be the intersection of and , and let be the points on , respectively, such that are on a line perpendicular to . Let the circumcircle of intersect again at . Suppose that the tangent of the circumcircle of at intersects at , and the segment intersects the circumcircle of at . Show that .
, 2021
Solution
Let be the circumcircle of , be the incircle and be the A-excircle. Let and be the two circles that are tangent to and , where is inside and is outside . Let be tangent to at and be tangent to at . The key observation is that are collinear. This can be split into two parts.
*Lemma 1. are collinear.*
Proof. Note that is the external homothetic center of and , and is the internal homothetic center of and . Therefore, by Monge theorem, passes the internal homothetic center of and .
Note that is the ratio of the radii of and . Therefore is the internal homothetic center of and . Also note that if we consider the homothety at with ratio , then is sent to the center of , and is sent to the center of (this is because that if is tangent to and at and , respectively, then it is well-known that are collinear, which shows that (center of ) ~ , and a similar argument works for ). This shows that is sent to and is sent to . As is sent to , we know that is the internal homothetic center of and , and thus is passed by .
*Lemma 2. are collinear.*
There are several proofs for this lemma. We present them all here.
Proof. Take the transformation that inverts with respect to with radius and then reflects with respect to . Then and . We also have and . Now suppose that , , and , then we know that is tangent to at and is tangent to at . Moreover, we know that is on because is on , and we have , showing that is parallel to . Now we just need to show that are concyclic. This is true as , which shows that is an isosceles trapezoid.
Alternative proof of Lemma 2. We still consider the same transformation as in the proof above. Let the tangents at , to intersect at . Then it suffices to show that lies on the polar line of with respect to , which is equivalent to showing that if intersects again at , then is harmonic. Equivalently, it suffices to show that after the transformation, is harmonic on the line , which is equivalent to saying that is the midpoint of . Now note that is the midpoint of as is harmonic. Since , we are done.
Yet another proof of Lemma 2. We still consider the points . Let intersect again at , respectively. Then it is clear that are parallel to , and to show that passes , it suffices to show that is symmetric to with respect to the midpoint of . This is true by the butterfly theorem as , are symmetric with respect to and .
Now by the two lemmas, it is clear that is either or . We will next show that it has to be . Note that since , we know that (because ). We also have , showing that . This shows that is between and , and so . Since it is well-known that , we know that . Similarly, we have . Therefore appear in order on the line they are on, and so , as desired. As a consequence, .