Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Mongolian IMO Team Selection Tests /2 of 11

Mongolian IMO Team Selection Tests, 2015

Algebra Difficulty 7.8 National Olympiad, round 2 Prove it Mongolia

Let f:R→Rf: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} be a continuous, bounded and non-constant function satisfying
f(2x)=2f(x)2−1 f(2x) = 2f(x)^2 - 1
for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. Show that the equation f(x)=0f(x) = 0 has a solution.

Solution

By the intermediate value theorem, it suffices to prove that ff takes both non-negative and non-positive values.

**Case f≥0f \ge 0:** Suppose that f(x)≥0f(x) \ge 0 for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. Then we have
f(x)=1+f(2x)2 f(x) = \sqrt{\frac{1 + f(2x)}{2}}
for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. Since the function
ϕ:[0,∞)→[0,∞),t↦1+t2, \phi: [0, \infty) \to [0, \infty), \quad t \mapsto \sqrt{\frac{1+t}{2}},
is strictly increasing we see that f≥12f \ge \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}. In fact, for the sequence defined by t0=0t_0 = 0 and tn=ϕ(tn−1)t_n = \phi(t_{n-1}), n≥1n \ge 1, we have f≥tnf \ge t_n for all nn by induction. However, it is easy to see that tn↗1t_n \nearrow 1. Thus we see that f≥1f \ge 1. Now suppose that for some x0∈Rx_0 \in \mathbb{R}, we have f(x0)>1f(x_0) > 1. Then f(2x0)=f(x0)2+f(x0)2−1>f(x0)2>1f(2x_0) = f(x_0)^2 + f(x_0)^2 - 1 > f(x_0)^2 > 1. By induction, we have f(2nx0)>f(x0)2nf(2^n x_0) > f(x_0)^{2^n} for all n∈Z≥1n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 1}, which contradicts the boundedness of ff. Hence f≤1f \le 1 and thus f=1f = 1, which is impossible since ff is non-constant.

**Case f≤0f \le 0:** Suppose that f(x)≤0f(x) \le 0 for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. Then we have
f(x)=−1+f(2x)2 f(x) = -\sqrt{\frac{1 + f(2x)}{2}}
for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. Note that the function
ψ:[−1,0]→[−1,0],t↦−1+t2, \psi: [-1,0] \to [-1,0], \quad t \mapsto -\sqrt{\frac{1+t}{2}},
is strictly decreasing. Thus for the sequence defined by s0=0s_0 = 0 and sn=ϕ(sn−1)s_n = \phi(s_{n-1}), n≥1n \ge 1, we have
s2n+1≤f≤s2n s_{2n+1} \le f \le s_{2n}
for all n≥0n \ge 0 by induction. Moreover, it is clear that s0≥s2≥s4≥…s_0 \ge s_2 \ge s_4 \ge \dots and s1≤s3≤s5≤…s_1 \le s_3 \le s_5 \le \dots so we consider the limits s2n↘as_{2n} \searrow a and s2n+1↗bs_{2n+1} \nearrow b. Clearly, both aa and bb are solutions of the equation ψ(ψ(s))=s\psi(\psi(s)) = s belonging to the interval [−1,0][-1,0]. However, it is easy to check that the solutions of ψ(ψ(s))=s\psi(\psi(s)) = s are roots of the polynomial P(s)=8s4−8s2−s+1=(s−1)(2s+1)(4s2+2s−1)P(s) = 8s^4 - 8s^2 - s + 1 = (s-1)(2s+1)(4s^2 + 2s - 1). But s=−1/2s = -1/2 is the only root of P(s)P(s) in the interval [−1,0][-1,0], thus a=b=−1/2a = b = -1/2. Hence ff is constant, a contradiction.

Combining the cases we get the solution.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.