Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Iranian Mathematical Olympiad /58 of 270

Iranian Mathematical Olympiad

Number theory Difficulty 5.9 AIME, harder Prove it Iran

We call an infinite set S⊆NS \subseteq \mathbb{N} good if for all pairwise distinct integers aa, bb, c∈Sc \in S, all positive divisors of ac−bca−b\frac{a^c - b^c}{a - b} are in SS. For all positive integers n>1n > 1, prove that there exists a good set SS such that n∉Sn \notin S.

Solution

Let L(z)L(z) be the smallest prime divisor of zz.

Lemma. If aa, bb, c∈Nc \in \mathbb{N} such that a≠ba \neq b we have
L(ac−bca−b)≥L(abc) L\left(\frac{a^c - b^c}{a - b}\right) \geq L(abc)
Proof. Assume the contrary, then there should be an integer pp such that gcd⁡(p,a)=gcd⁡(p,b)=1\gcd(p, a) = \gcd(p, b) = 1 and p∣ac−bca−bp \mid \frac{a^c-b^c}{a-b}. Now consider two cases, if a≡b(modp)a \equiv b \pmod{p} then by lifting the exponent lemma νp(ac−bc)=νp(a−b)\nu_p(a^c-b^c) = \nu_p(a-b) which is a contradiction. If a≢b(modp)a \not\equiv b \pmod{p} then ordp(ab−1)≠1ord_p(ab^{-1}) \neq 1 (b−1b^{-1} is multiplicative inverse of bb modulo pp). But we know that ordp(ab−1)∣cord_p(ab^{-1}) \mid c and we have p>ordp(ab−1)>L(c)p > \text{ord}_p(ab^{-1}) > L(c) which is a contradiction.

Consider a set
Ak={x∈N∣L(x)≥k} A_k = \{x \in \mathbb{N} \mid L(x) \geq k\}
now if aa, bb, c∈Akc \in A_k and d∣ac−bca−bd \mid \frac{a^c-b^c}{a-b} then by lemma we have L(d)<L(abc)<nL(d) < L(abc) < n and hence d∈Akd \in A_k. Now it is enough to take k>nk > n. ■

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.