Each integer from to was colored either red, or blue, and each color was used at least once. It turned out that
* Every red number is a sum of some two distinct blue numbers;
* Every blue number is a difference of some two red numbers.
Find the smallest number for which such coloring is possible.
, 2023
Solution
The smallest such number is .
Suppose that is a number allowing for coloring with the desired properties. Then since each color needs to be used at least once. Note that cannot be blue since it is inexpressible as a difference of two numbers between and , therefore is red. On the other hand, and cannot be red, since none of them is a sum of two distinct positive integers, which means and are blue (and in particular ). Now cannot be a difference of two red numbers (since is blue), so is red. Similarly has to be red since both and are blue. It follows that .
Since is red, it needs to be a sum of two distinct blue numbers. But a sum of two blue numbers cannot exceed
Therefore, .
If , then the only remaining possibility to express as a sum of two blue numbers is , but then is not a difference of two red numbers, contradiction. Similarly with .
We have proved that . It remains to show that there exists a valid coloring for . We can color , , , , blue and , , , red. Correctness of this coloring follows from the simple arithmetic: