The answer is bN=N/2.
Solution 1. First of all, assume that bN<N/2 satisfies the condition. Take x=1+t for t>0, we should have
2(1+t)2N+1≤(1+t+bNt2)N.
Expanding the brackets we get
(1+t+bNt2)N−2(1+t)2N+1=(NbN−2N2)t2+c3t3+⋯+c2Nt2N(1)
with some coefficients c3,…,c2N. Since bN<N/2, the right hand side of (1) is negative for sufficiently small t. A contradiction.
Now we denote I(N,x) for the inequality. It remains to prove the inequality I(N,x) with bN=N/2 for an arbitrary positive integer N.
First of all, I(N,0) is obvious. Further, if x>0, then the left hand sides of I(N,−x) and I(N,x) coincide, while the right hand side of I(N,−x) is larger than that of I(N,x) (their difference equals 2(N−1)x≥0). Therefore, I(N,−x) follows from I(N,x). So, hereafter we suppose that x>0.
Divide I(N,x) by x and let t=(x−1)2/x=x−2+1/x; then I(N,x) reads as
fN:=2xN+x−N≤(1+2Nt)N.(2)
The key identity is the expansion of fN as a polynomial in t:
Lemma.
fN=Nk=0∑NN+k1(2kN+k)tk.(3)
---
Proof. Apply induction on N. We will make use of the straightforward recurrence relation
fN+1+fN−1=(x+1/x)fN=(2+t)fN.(4)
The base cases N=1,2 are straightforward:
f1=1+2t,f2=21t2+2t+1.
For the induction step from N−1 and N to N+1, we compute the coefficient of tk in fN+1 using the formula fN+1=(2+t)fN−fN−1. For k=0 that coefficient equals 1, for k>0 it equals
2N+kN(2kN+k)+N+k−1N(2k−2N+k−1)−N+k−1N−1(2kN+k−1)=(2k)!(N−k)!(N+k−1)!(2N+(N+k−1)(N−k+1)2k(2k−1)N−N+k−1(N−1)(N−k))=(2k)!(N−k+1)!(N+k−1)!(2N(N−k+1)+3kN+k−N2−N)=(N+k+1)(2kN+k+1)(N+1),
that completes the induction. □
Turning back to the problem, in order to prove (2) we write
(1+2Nt)N−fN=(1+2Nt)N−Nk=0∑NN+k1(2kN+k)tk=k=0∑Nαktk,
where
αk=(2N)k(kN)−N+kN(2kN+k)=(2N)k(kN)(1−2k(k+1)⋯(2k)(1+1/N)(1+2/N)⋯(1+(k−1)/N))≥(2N)k(kN)(1−2k(k+1)⋯(2k)2⋅3⋯k)=(2N)k(kN)(1−j=1∏kk+j2j)≥0,
and (2) follows.
Solution 2. Here we present another proof of the inequality (2) for x>0, or, equivalently, for t=(x−1)2/x≥0. Instead of finding the coefficients of the polynomial fN=fN(t) we may find its roots, which is in a sense more straightforward. Note that the recurrence (4) and the initial conditions f0=1,f1=1+t/2 imply that fN is a polynomial in t of degree N. It also follows by induction that fN(0)=1,fN′(0)=N2/2: the recurrence relations read as fN+1(0)+fN−1(0)=2fN(0) and fN+1′(0)+fN−1′(0)=2fN′(0)+fN(0), respectively.
Next, if xk=exp(2Niπ(2k−1)) for k∈1,2,…,N, then
−tk:=2−xk−xk1=2−2cos2Nπ(2k−1)=4sin24Nπ(2k−1)>0
and
fN(tk)=2xkN+xk−N=2exp(2iπ(2k−1))+exp(−2iπ(2k−1))=0.
So the roots of fN are t1,…,tN and by the AM-GM inequality we have
fN(t)=(1−t1t)(1−t2t)…(1−tNt)≤(1−Nt(t11+⋯+tN1))N=(1+NtfN′(0))N=(1+2Nt)N.
Solution 3. Here we solve the problem when N≥1 is an arbitrary real number. For a real number a let
f(x)=(2x2N+1)N1−a(x−1)2−x.
Then f(1)=0,
f′(x)=(2x2N+1)N1−1x2N−1−2a(x−1)−1,f′(1)=0
f′′(x)=(1−N)(2x2N+1)N1−2x4N−2+(2N−1)(2x2N+1)N1−1x2N−2−2a,
f′′(1)=N−2a.
So if a<2N, the function f has a strict local minimum at point 1, and the inequality f(x)≤0=f(1) does not hold. This proves bN≥N/2.
For a=2N we have f′′(1)=0 and
f′′′(x)=21(1−N)(1−2N)(2x2N+1)N1−3x2N−3(1−x2N){>0,<0,if 0<x<1,if x>1.
Hence, f′′(x)<0 for x=1; f′(x)>0 for x<1 and f′(x)<0 for x>1, finally f(x)<0 for x=1.