Answer. The smallest possible integer with that property is n=13.
We note that we have xyz∣(x+y+z)n if and only if for each prime p the inequality vp(xyz)≤vp((x+y+z)n) holds, where as usual vp(m) denotes the exponent of p in the prime factorization of m.
Let x, y and z be positive integers with x∣y3, y∣z3 and z∣x3. Let p be an arbitrary prime, and w.l.o.g. let the multiplicity of p be lowest in z, that is, vp(z)=min{vp(x),vp(y),vp(z)}.
Then we have vp(x+y+z)≥vp(z), and from the divisibility constraints we get vp(x)≤3vp(y)≤9vp(z). It follows that
vp(xyz)=vp(x)+vp(y)+vp(z)≤9vp(z)+3vp(z)+vp(z)=13vp(z)≤13vp(x+y+z)=vp((x+y+z)13),
which proves that for n=13 the desired property is satisfied.
It remains to show that this is indeed the smallest possible integer with this property. For doing so, let n now be a number that has the desired property. By setting (x,y,z)=(p9,p3,p1) with an arbitrary prime p (in order to achieve that both inequalities in the previous calculation become equalities), we get
13=vp(p13)=vp(p9⋅p3⋅p1)=vp(xyz)≤vp((x+y+z)n)=vp((p9+p3+p1)n)=n⋅vp(p(p8+p2+1))=n,
which yields n≥13.