Let c>2, and let a(1),a(2),… be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that a(m+n)≤2a(m)+2a(n) for all m,n≥1,(1) and a(2k)≤(k+1)c1 for all k≥0(2) Prove that the sequence a(n) is bounded.
Solution
For convenience, define a(0)=0; then condition (1) persists for all pairs of nonnegative indices.
Lemma 1. For arbitrary nonnegative indices n1,…,nk, we have a(i=1∑kni)≤i=1∑k2ia(ni)(3) and a(i=1∑kni)≤2ki=1∑ka(ni).(4) Proof. Inequality (3) is proved by induction on k. The base case k=1 is trivial, while the induction step is provided by a(∑i=1k+1ni)=a(n1+∑i=2k+1ni)≤2a(n1)+2a(∑i=1kni+1)≤2a(n1)+2∑i=1k2ia(ni+1)=∑i=1k+12ia(ni).
To establish (4), first the inequality ai=1∑2dni≤2di=1∑2da(ni) can be proved by an obvious induction on d. Then, turning to (4), we find an integer d such that 2d−1<k≤2d to obtain a(i=1∑kni)=ai=1∑kni+i=k+1∑2d0≤2di=1∑ka(ni)+i=k+1∑2da(0)=2di=1∑ka(ni)≤2ki=1∑ka(ni).
Fix an increasing unbounded sequence 0=M0<M1<M2<… of real numbers; the exact values will be defined later. Let n be an arbitrary positive integer and write n=i=0∑dεi⋅2i, where εi∈{0,1} Set εi=0 for i>d, and take some positive integer f such that Mf>d. Applying (3), we get a(n)=ak=1∑fMk−1≤i<Mk∑εi⋅2i≤k=1∑f2kaMk−1≤i<Mk∑εi⋅2i. Note that there are less than Mk−Mk−1+1 integers in interval [Mk−1,Mk); hence, using (4) we have a(n)≤k=1∑f2k⋅2(Mk−Mk−1+1)Mk−1≤i<Mk∑εi⋅a(2i)≤k=1∑f2k⋅2(Mk−Mk−1+1)2Mk−1≤i<Mkmaxa(2i)≤k=1∑f2k+1(Mk+1)2⋅(Mk−1+1)c1=k=1∑f(Mk−1+1Mk+1)2(Mk−1+1)c−22k+1 Setting Mk=4k/(c−2)−1, we obtain a(n)≤k=1∑f42/(c−2)(4(k−1)/(c−2))c−22k+1=8⋅42/(c−2)k=1∑f(21)k<8⋅42/(c−2) and the sequence a(n) is bounded.
Solution 2:
Lemma 2. Suppose that s1,…,sk are positive integers such that i=1∑k2−si≤1 Then for arbitrary positive integers n1,…,nk we have a(i=1∑kni)≤i=1∑k2sia(ni) Proof. Apply an induction on k. The base cases are k=1 (trivial) and k=2 (follows from the condition (1)). Suppose that k>2. We can assume that s1≤s2≤⋯≤sk. Note that i=1∑k−12−si≤1−2−sk−1 since the left-hand side is a fraction with the denominator 2sk−1, and this fraction is less than 1 . Define sk−1′=sk−1−1 and nk−1′=nk−1+nk; then we have i=1∑k−22−si+2−sk−1′≤(1−2⋅2−sk−1)+21−sk−1=1 Now, the induction hypothesis can be applied to achieve a(i=1∑kni)=a(i=1∑k−2ni+nk−1′)≤i=1∑k−22sia(ni)+2sk−1′a(nk−1′)≤i=1∑k−22sia(ni)+2sk−1−1⋅2(a(nk−1)+a(nk))≤i=1∑k−22sia(ni)+2sk−1a(nk−1)+2ska(nk)
Let q=c/2>1. Take an arbitrary positive integer n and write n=i=1∑k2ui,0≤u1<u2<⋯<uk. Choose si=⌊log2(ui+1)q⌋+d(i=1,…,k) for some integer d. We have i=1∑k2−si=2−di=1∑k2−⌊log2(ui+1)q⌋, and we choose d in such a way that 21<i=1∑k2−si≤1 In particular, this implies 2d<2i=1∑k2−⌊log2(ui+1)q⌋<4i=1∑k(ui+1)q1. Now, by Lemma 2 we obtain a(n)=a(i=1∑k2ui)≤i=1∑k2sia(2ui)≤i=1∑k2d(ui+1)q⋅(ui+1)2q1=2di=1∑k(ui+1)q1<4(i=1∑k(ui+1)q1)2 which is bounded since q>1.
Looking for a route rather than an archive? The track puts 2,000
problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.
Source: MathNet,
licensed CC-BY-4.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.