The functions and both satisfy the following equations:
Either show that there is no other function satisfying the above equation for all , or prove that another such function exists.
Irish Mathematical Olympiad
Solution
There are infinitely many solutions. We first examine some constraints.
If for , then and so . Similarly if for . Now let and substitute in the given functional equation. We obtain , hence and must have different signs. This forces .
Requiring the given functional equation for all (positive integers) makes sense as a condition on functions . If we can find such a function , then we get a solution to our original problem when we extend it to a function defined on by letting and , .
We already know that must be injective (on ), so one possibility is to take to be a distinct multiple of 4 for distinct . Then the given functional equation just gives a sequence of uncoupled restrictions on . The idea is therefore to pick some simple function and write for most values of , but instead use the given equation.
to define for some numbers . Defining this way for in terms of certainly gives a value that is still a multiple of 4. Any monotonic function that increases quickly enough to ensure that will suffice. For example, fix an integer and take , and so, for we define
This equation gives , and also defines , , in terms of for , . Thus it assigns exactly one value to . Inductively we see that for all . This inequality implies that and so, in the exceptional case ,
and obviously . Thus is injective. Because for it is also now clear that satisfies the given equation.