Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Olimpiadi di Matematica /32 of 32

Olimpiadi di Matematica

Algebra Difficulty 7.5 National Olympiad, round 2 Prove it Italy

Problem:

A sequence {xn∣n=0,1,2,…}\{x_{n} \mid n=0,1,2, \ldots\} of real numbers is defined, as the real parameter aa varies, as follows:
{x0=axn+1=2−xn2 for n≥1 \left\{ \begin{array}{l} x_{0}=a \\ x_{n+1}=2-x_{n}^{2} \quad \text{ for } n \geq 1 \end{array} \right.

a. Find all values of aa for which xnx_{n} is constant (that is, xn=ax_{n}=a holds for all nn).

b. Prove that for one of the values found in part (a) (which we will call yy) it holds that, if ∣a∣<∣y∣,∣xn∣<∣y∣|a|<|y|,\left|x_{n}\right|<|y| for all nn.

c. Prove that, if ∣a∣>∣y∣,xn|a|>|y|, x_{n} is strictly decreasing.

Solution

Solution:

a. If xnx_{n} must be constant, then in particular it must hold that
x1=x0=a. x_{1}=x_{0}=a.
But then
a=x1=2−x02=2−a2, a=x_{1}=2-x_{0}^{2}=2-a^{2},
so aa must satisfy the equation
a2+a−2=0 a^{2}+a-2=0
which has as solutions a=−2a=-2 and a=1a=1. No other value can make the sequence constant (but a priori we do not yet know whether these actually work).
Let us verify that both of these values do indeed generate a constant sequence: since the sequence is defined by recursion, at this point we will also have
x2=2−x12=2−a2=a x_{2}=2-x_{1}^{2}=2-a^{2}=a
and, in the same way, x3=ax_{3}=a and so on (we have in fact given a proof by induction, although one so immediate that it does not need the usual formalization).
Therefore the required values are exactly −2-2 and 11.

b. Let us prove that this is true for y=−2y=-2. First of all, observe that since the square of a real number can never be negative, we will have xn≤2x_{n} \leq 2 for every n≥1n \geq 1; hence, apart from the possible exception of x0=ax_{0}=a, all values of the sequence are smaller than 22.
Suppose now that
∣a∣<∣y∣=∣−2∣=2, |a|<|y|=|-2|=2,
we prove by induction on nn that
∣xn∣<2 for every n≥0. \left|x_{n}\right|<2 \text{ for every } n \geq 0.
The base step is exactly the hypothesis (∣x0∣=∣a∣<2)\left(\left|x_{0}\right|=|a|<2\right).
Assuming the inequality holds for xn−1x_{n-1}, we now prove that it also holds for xnx_{n}.
Indeed if ∣xn−1∣<2\left|x_{n-1}\right|<2, evidently xn−12<4x_{n-1}^{2}<4; but
xn=2−xn−12 x_{n}=2-x_{n-1}^{2}
and therefore
−2=2−4<2−xn−12=xn<2, -2=2-4<2-x_{n-1}^{2}=x_{n}<2,
that is ∣xn∣<2\left|x_{n}\right|<2, which completes the proof of the inductive step.
Incidentally we observe that the property does not hold instead for the other value from point a), 11: indeed for example if a=0a=0 we have ∣a∣<1|a|<1, but ∣x1∣=∣2−a2∣=2>1\left|x_{1}\right|=\left|2-a^{2}\right|=2>1. One can also show that in fact −2-2 is the only real number that has the property indicated in the question.

c. Suppose now that ∣a∣>2|a|>2; it will be more convenient to prove by induction on nn the following property, which is stronger than our claim:
 "for every n≥0,∣xn∣>2 and xn+1<xn ".  \text{ "for every } n \geq 0,\left|x_{n}\right|>2 \text{ and } x_{n+1}<x_{n} \text{ ". }
To prove the base step we must show that the inequalities hold in the case n=0n=0. We observe that the first inequality is exactly our hypothesis, so it certainly holds; for the second, instead, let us set c0=∣a∣−2>0c_{0}=|a|-2>0. Then ∣a∣=2+c0|a|=2+c_{0} and
x1=2−a2=2−(2+c0)2=−2−2c0−c02<−(2+c0)=−∣a∣≤a=x0, x_{1}=2-a^{2}=2-\left(2+c_{0}\right)^{2}=-2-2 c_{0}-c_{0}^{2}<-(2+c_{0})=-|a| \leq a=x_{0},
so the base step is proved.
The proof of the inductive step is entirely analogous. For every n≥1n \geq 1 suppose that the inequalities are satisfied for n−1n-1; then we can set cn−1=∣xn−1∣−2>0c_{n-1}=\left|x_{n-1}\right|-2>0 and derive as above
xn=2−xn−12=−2−2cn−1−cn−12<−(2+cn−1)=−∣xn−1∣ x_{n}=2-x_{n-1}^{2}=-2-2 c_{n-1}-c_{n-1}^{2}<-(2+c_{n-1})=-\left|x_{n-1}\right|
(which shows in particular that xn<0x_{n}<0 as soon as n≥1n \geq 1).
Then on one hand for all n≥1n \geq 1
∣xn∣=−xn>∣xn−1∣>2 \left|x_{n}\right|=-x_{n}>\left|x_{n-1}\right|>2
that is the first inequality to be proved;
on the other hand for n≥2n \geq 2 (that is, when we know that xn−1<0x_{n-1}<0)
xn<−∣xn−1∣=xn−1, x_{n}< -\left|x_{n-1}\right|=x_{n-1},
while for n=1n=1 in any case (as we have seen)
xn<−∣xn−1∣≤xn−1, x_{n}< -\left|x_{n-1}\right| \leq x_{n-1},
so the second inequality is also verified for nn as well; and by induction at this point the inequalities hold for all n≥0n \geq 0, that is, the property is true.
But as we said the property is stronger than our claim, which is therefore also proved.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement translated into English from it; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.