Let denote the set of real numbers. Define the set and the function as
Given an odd integer , are there real numbers () such that for arbitrary numbers , the number computed by the following formulas
always equals the product ?
, 2014
Solution
Solution: Observing small cases (such as ), it is easy to conjecture that
satisfies the requirements of the problem. Thus what remains difficult is to prove that this indeed satisfies the requirements of the problem. Note that and also each have only the two possible values . We have if and only if there is an even number of 's among the ; on the other hand, since , in this case is
Hence if and only if , that is, the number of 's equal to exceeds the number equal to (since ).
Thus our goal is equivalent to proving: "the number of 's equal to exceeds the number equal to " if and only if "there is an even number of 's among the ."
Returning to the formulas. Let denote the value in the formula for before applying sign, i.e.
and . Adding and gives the identity (here ). If , then except for the case , in all other cases have opposite signs (note that must be odd); conversely if , then except for the case , in all other cases also have opposite signs. Therefore, except for the two cases or , the values of and are exactly one and one .
Below we consider the case where there is an even number of 's among the . We first prove that . According to
Since regardless of the value of , is always congruent to 2 modulo 4, we have
The last equality is exactly because there is an even number of . Thus we have proven .
Next we prove that there must be some for which occurs. Otherwise, if this does not happen, since is also already impossible, this means that for all , and are exactly one 1 and one , so
But since and are odd, is also odd, a contradiction.
Therefore, if we let denote the sum over all of "the number of 1's among and ", its value must equal twice the number of 1's among (since each is counted twice). By the two facts proven above, and must have at least one equal to 1, and there must be some such that and are both 1, so , from which we deduce that the number of 1's among must exceed the number of 's.
And when there is an odd number of 's among the , through the same proof process we can obtain , and that there must be some for which occurs, thereby obtaining that the number of values equal to among exceeds the number of values equal to 1. This completes the proof.