Let n be a positive integer. Real numbers a1,a2,…,a2n satisfy the following conditions:
(1) For every i=1,2,…,2n−1, one has 0<ai+1−ai≤1;
(2) Rounding the numbers a1,a2,…,a2n to the closest integer (numbers equidistant from two closest integers are rounded up) gives pairwise distinct positive integers.
Numbers a1,a2,…,a2n are placed as the numerators and denominators of n fractions. Prove that the sum of the obtained fractions is greater than 4n.
Solutions — 3
Solution 1
Suppose that a numerator is greater than a denominator. Then interchanging these two numbers makes both fractions smaller. Thus we can assume w.l.o.g. that all numerators are less than all denominators.
For every i=1,2,…,2n, define xi=ai−i+21. As a1<a2<⋯<a2n and rounding the numbers ai produce pairwise distinct positive integers, we must have ai≥i−21 which implies xi≥0. From ai+1−ai≤1, we have xi+1−xi=ai+1−ai−1≤0 which implies x1≥x2≥⋯≥x2n.
Hence i<j always implies aj−xjai−xj≥aj−xjai−xj≥aj−xjai−xi=2j−12i−1 (the first inequality holds because of ai<aj and xj≥0 while the second inequality holds because of xi≥xj). Thus it suffices to prove the desired inequality for the case where the numerators are integers 1,3,…,2n−1 and the denominators are integers 2n+1,2n+3,…,4n−1 in some order.
Denote the sum of all fractions by s. Applying AM-GM to the fractions gives ns≥n(2n+1)(2n+3)⋯(4n−1)1⋅3⋯(2n−1). Thus it suffices to prove for every n the inequality (2n+1)(2n+3)⋯(4n−1)1⋅3⋯(2n−1)>4n1. We can do it by induction on n.
The claim holds for n=1 since 31>41. For the induction step, it suffices to show that (4n+1)(4n+3)(2n+1)2>41 which is equivalent to (4n+2)2>(4n+1)(4n+3). The latter follows from AM-GM for 4n+1 and 4n+3.
Solution 2
Firstly, show as in Solution 1 that it suffices to prove the desired inequality for the case where the numerators are 1,3,…,2n−1 and the denominators are 2n+1,2n+3,…,4n−1 in some order. By applying the rearrangement inequality for 1<3<⋯<2n−1 and 2n+11>2n+31>⋯>4n−11, we conclude that the least sum of fractions is obtained if both numerators and denominators are in the increasing order. Hence it suffices to show that 2n+11+2n+33+⋯+4n−12n−1>4n.
Put the first summand together with the last one, the second one together with the second last one, etc. The fractions of every pair are of the form 3n−kn−k and 3n+kn+k where −n<k<n. The sum of these two terms is 9n2−k26n2−2k2. As −n<k<n, we must have k2<n2; we also see that both 6n2−2k2 and 9n2−k2 are positive. Thus the inequality 9n2−k2<12n2−4k2, being equivalent to the valid inequality k2<n2, is also equivalent to 9n2−k26n2−2k2>21. Hence the sum of members of all n pairs is greater than 2n, and as each fraction occurs twice in these pairs, the sum of all fractions is greater than 4n.
Solution 3
Firstly, show as in Solution 1 that it suffices to prove the desired inequality for the case where the numerators are 1,3,…,2n−1 and the denominators are 2n+1,2n+3,…,4n−1 in some order. Replacing all denominators with their strict upper bound 4n, all fractions become smaller and so does their sum. The sum of numerators 1+3+⋯+(2n−1) equals n2. Hence the sum of all fractions is greater than 4nn2, i.e., than 4n.
Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track
puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.
Source: MathNet,
licensed CC-BY-4.0.
Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.