We have the following observations.
(i) (P(n),P(n+1))=1 for any n.
We have (P(n),P(n+1))=(n2+n+1,n2+3n+3)=(n2+n+1,2n+2). Noting that n2+n+1 is odd and (n2+n+1,n+1)=(1,n+1)=1, the claim follows.
(ii) (P(n),P(n+2))=1 for n≡2(mod7) and (P(n),P(n+2))=7 for n≡2(mod7).
From (2n+7)P(n)−(2n−1)P(n+2)=14 and the fact that P(n) is odd, (P(n),P(n+2)) must be a divisor of 7. The claim follows by checking n≡0,1,…,6(mod7) directly.
(iii) (P(n),P(n+3))=1 for n≡1(mod3) and 3∣(P(n),P(n+3)) for n≡1(mod3).
From (n+5)P(n)−(n−1)P(n+3)=18 and the fact that P(n) is odd, (P(n),P(n+3)) must be a divisor of 9. The claim follows by checking n≡0,1,2(mod3) directly.
Suppose there exists a fragrant set with at most 5 elements. We may assume it contains exactly 5 elements P(a),P(a+1),…,P(a+4) since the following argument also works with fewer elements. Consider P(a+2). From (i), it is relatively prime to P(a+1) and P(a+3). Without loss of generality, assume (P(a),P(a+2))>1. From (ii), we have a≡2(mod7). The same observation implies (P(a+1),P(a+3))=1. In order that the set is fragrant, (P(a),P(a+3)) and (P(a+1),P(a+4)) must both be greater than 1. From (iii), this holds only when both a and a+1 are congruent to 1(mod3), which is a contradiction.
It now suffices to construct a fragrant set of size 6. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we can take a positive integer a such that
a≡7(mod19),a+1≡2(mod7),a+2≡1(mod3).
For example, we may take a=197. From (ii), both P(a+1) and P(a+3) are divisible by 7. From (iii), both P(a+2) and P(a+5) are divisible by 3. One also checks from 19∣P(7)=57 and 19∣P(11)=133 that P(a) and P(a+4) are divisible by 19. Therefore, the set {P(a),P(a+1),…,P(a+5)} is fragrant.
Therefore, the smallest size of a fragrant set is 6.