Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Olimpiade Italiana di Matematica /19 of 36

Olimpiade Italiana di Matematica

Algebra Difficulty 6.6 National Olympiad Prove it Italy

Problem:

We denote by ⌊x⌋\lfloor x\rfloor the largest integer ≤\leq than xx.
Let λ≥1\lambda \geq 1 be a real number, and nn a positive integer, such that ⌊λn+1⌋,⌊λn+2⌋,…,⌊λ4n⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{n+1}\right\rfloor,\left\lfloor\lambda^{n+2}\right\rfloor, \ldots,\left\lfloor\lambda^{4 n}\right\rfloor are all perfect squares. Prove that ⌊λ⌋\lfloor\lambda\rfloor is a perfect square.

Solution

Solution:

Let us first prove the case n=1n=1. Knowing that ⌊λ2⌋,⌊λ3⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{2}\right\rfloor,\left\lfloor\lambda^{3}\right\rfloor, and ⌊λ4⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{4}\right\rfloor are perfect squares, we want to show that ⌊λ⌋\lfloor\lambda\rfloor is a perfect square. Setting a2=⌊λ2⌋a^{2}=\left\lfloor\lambda^{2}\right\rfloor, we have the inequalities:
a2≤λ2<a2+1 a^{2} \leq \lambda^{2}<a^{2}+1
from which, in particular, λ2<(a+1)2\lambda^{2}<(a+1)^{2}, hence a≤λ<a+1a \leq \lambda<a+1 and ⌊λ⌋=a\lfloor\lambda\rfloor=a. Squaring the previous chain of inequalities, we obtain
a4≤λ4<(a2+1)2 a^{4} \leq \lambda^{4}<\left(a^{2}+1\right)^{2}
and, since a4a^{4} and (a2+1)2\left(a^{2}+1\right)^{2} are consecutive perfect squares, ⌊λ4⌋=a4\left\lfloor\lambda^{4}\right\rfloor=a^{4}. Consequently λ4−a4<1\lambda^{4}-a^{4}<1. Now, using the hypothesis λ≥1\lambda \geq 1,
λ3−a3=(λ−a)(λ2+λa+a2)≤(λ−a)(λ(λ2+λa+a2)+a3)=λ4−a4 \lambda^{3}-a^{3}=(\lambda-a)\left(\lambda^{2}+\lambda a+a^{2}\right) \leq(\lambda-a)\left(\lambda\left(\lambda^{2}+\lambda a+a^{2}\right)+a^{3}\right)=\lambda^{4}-a^{4}
so we also have
a3≤λ3=a3+λ3−a3≤a3+λ4−a4<a3+1 a^{3} \leq \lambda^{3}=a^{3}+\lambda^{3}-a^{3} \leq a^{3}+\lambda^{4}-a^{4}<a^{3}+1
which implies ⌊λ3⌋=a3\left\lfloor\lambda^{3}\right\rfloor=a^{3}. By hypothesis, we therefore know that a3a^{3} is a perfect square, hence a=⌊λ⌋a=\lfloor\lambda\rfloor is also a perfect square, as required.

Let us now prove the general case, by induction on nn. The base case, n=1n=1, has been established. For the inductive step, suppose we know that, if ⌊λn+1⌋,⌊λn+2⌋,…,⌊λ4n⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{n+1}\right\rfloor,\left\lfloor\lambda^{n+2}\right\rfloor, \ldots,\left\lfloor\lambda^{4 n}\right\rfloor are all perfect squares, then ⌊λ⌋\lfloor\lambda\rfloor is a perfect square. From the fact that ⌊λ(n+1)+1⌋,⌊λ(n+1)+2⌋,…,⌊λ4(n+1)⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{(n+1)+1}\right\rfloor,\left\lfloor\lambda^{(n+1)+2}\right\rfloor, \ldots,\left\lfloor\lambda^{4(n+1)}\right\rfloor are all perfect squares, we want to deduce that ⌊λ⌋\lfloor\lambda\rfloor is a perfect square. If we also knew that ⌊λn+1⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{n+1}\right\rfloor is a perfect square, then we could apply the inductive hypothesis and conclude immediately. Now, setting λˉ=λn+1\bar{\lambda}=\lambda^{n+1}, in particular, ⌊λˉ2⌋,⌊λˉ3⌋\left\lfloor\bar{\lambda}^{2}\right\rfloor,\left\lfloor\bar{\lambda}^{3}\right\rfloor, and ⌊λˉ4⌋\left\lfloor\bar{\lambda}^{4}\right\rfloor are three of our perfect squares. From the case n=1n=1 applied to λˉ\bar{\lambda} it therefore follows that ⌊λn+1⌋\left\lfloor\lambda^{n+1}\right\rfloor is a perfect square, and this concludes the proof.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement translated into English from it; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.