Olympiad Maths Prep

Library / /2 of 21

, 2007

Number theory Difficulty 7.7 National olympiad, round 2 Prove it IMO

Let kk be a positive integer. Prove that the number (4k21)2\left(4 k^{2}-1\right)^{2} has a positive divisor of the form 8kn18 k n-1 if and only if kk is even.

Solution

The statement follows from the following fact.

Lemma. For arbitrary positive integers xx and yy, the number 4xy14 x y-1 divides (4x21)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} if and only if x=yx=y.

Proof. If x=yx=y then 4xy1=4x214 x y-1=4 x^{2}-1 obviously divides (4x21)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} so it is sufficient to consider the opposite direction.

Call a pair (x,y)(x, y) of positive integers bad if 4xy14 x y-1 divides (4x21)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} but xyx \neq y. In order to prove that bad pairs do not exist, we present two properties of them which provide an infinite descent.

Property (i). If (x,y)(x, y) is a bad pair and x<yx<y then there exists a positive integer z<xz<x such that (x,z)(x, z) is also bad.

Let r=(4x21)24xy1r=\frac{\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2}}{4 x y-1}. Then
r=r(1)r(4xy1)=(4x21)21(mod4x) r=-r \cdot(-1) \equiv -r(4 x y-1) = -\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} \equiv -1 \quad (\bmod 4 x)
and r=4xz1r=4 x z-1 with some positive integer zz. From x<yx<y we obtain that
4xz1=(4x21)24xy1<4x21 4 x z-1=\frac{\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2}}{4 x y-1}<4 x^{2}-1
and therefore z<xz<x. By the construction, the number 4xz14 x z-1 is a divisor of (4x21)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} so (x,z)(x, z) is a bad pair.

Property (ii). If (x,y)(x, y) is a bad pair then (y,x)(y, x) is also bad.

Since 1=12(4xy)2(mod4xy1)1=1^{2} \equiv (4 x y)^{2} (\bmod 4 x y-1), we have
(4y21)2(4y2(4xy)2)2=16y4(4x21)20(mod4xy1) \left(4 y^{2}-1\right)^{2} \equiv \left(4 y^{2}-(4 x y)^{2}\right)^{2}=16 y^{4}\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} \equiv 0 \quad (\bmod 4 x y-1)
Hence, the number 4xy14 x y-1 divides (4y21)2\left(4 y^{2}-1\right)^{2} as well.

Now suppose that there exists at least one bad pair. Take a bad pair (x,y)(x, y) such that 2x+y2 x+y attains its smallest possible value. If x<yx<y then property (i) provides a bad pair (x,z)(x, z) with z<yz<y and thus 2x+z<2x+y2 x+z<2 x+y. Otherwise, if y<xy<x, property (ii) yields that pair (y,x)(y, x) is also bad while 2y+x<2x+y2 y+x<2 x+y. Both cases contradict the assumption that 2x+y2 x+y is minimal; the Lemma is proved.

To prove the problem statement, apply the Lemma for x=kx=k and y=2ny=2 n; the number 8kn18 k n-1 divides (4k21)2\left(4 k^{2}-1\right)^{2} if and only if k=2nk=2 n. Hence, there is no such nn if kk is odd and n=k/2n=k / 2 is the only solution if kk is even.

Looking for a route rather than an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.