Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / IMO Shortlist /32 of 365

IMO Shortlist, 2007

Number theory Difficulty 7.7 National Olympiad, round 2 Prove it IMO

Let kk be a positive integer. Prove that the number (4k2−1)2\left(4 k^{2}-1\right)^{2} has a positive divisor of the form 8kn−18 k n-1 if and only if kk is even.

Solution

The statement follows from the following fact.

Lemma. For arbitrary positive integers xx and yy, the number 4xy−14 x y-1 divides (4x2−1)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} if and only if x=yx=y.

Proof. If x=yx=y then 4xy−1=4x2−14 x y-1=4 x^{2}-1 obviously divides (4x2−1)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} so it is sufficient to consider the opposite direction.

Call a pair (x,y)(x, y) of positive integers bad if 4xy−14 x y-1 divides (4x2−1)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} but x≠yx \neq y. In order to prove that bad pairs do not exist, we present two properties of them which provide an infinite descent.

Property (i). If (x,y)(x, y) is a bad pair and x<yx<y then there exists a positive integer z<xz<x such that (x,z)(x, z) is also bad.

Let r=(4x2−1)24xy−1r=\frac{\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2}}{4 x y-1}. Then
r=−r⋅(−1)≡−r(4xy−1)=−(4x2−1)2≡−1( mod 4x) r=-r \cdot(-1) \equiv -r(4 x y-1) = -\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} \equiv -1 \quad (\bmod 4 x)
and r=4xz−1r=4 x z-1 with some positive integer zz. From x<yx<y we obtain that
4xz−1=(4x2−1)24xy−1<4x2−1 4 x z-1=\frac{\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2}}{4 x y-1}<4 x^{2}-1
and therefore z<xz<x. By the construction, the number 4xz−14 x z-1 is a divisor of (4x2−1)2\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} so (x,z)(x, z) is a bad pair.

Property (ii). If (x,y)(x, y) is a bad pair then (y,x)(y, x) is also bad.

Since 1=12≡(4xy)2( mod 4xy−1)1=1^{2} \equiv (4 x y)^{2} (\bmod 4 x y-1), we have
(4y2−1)2≡(4y2−(4xy)2)2=16y4(4x2−1)2≡0( mod 4xy−1) \left(4 y^{2}-1\right)^{2} \equiv \left(4 y^{2}-(4 x y)^{2}\right)^{2}=16 y^{4}\left(4 x^{2}-1\right)^{2} \equiv 0 \quad (\bmod 4 x y-1)
Hence, the number 4xy−14 x y-1 divides (4y2−1)2\left(4 y^{2}-1\right)^{2} as well.

Now suppose that there exists at least one bad pair. Take a bad pair (x,y)(x, y) such that 2x+y2 x+y attains its smallest possible value. If x<yx<y then property (i) provides a bad pair (x,z)(x, z) with z<yz<y and thus 2x+z<2x+y2 x+z<2 x+y. Otherwise, if y<xy<x, property (ii) yields that pair (y,x)(y, x) is also bad while 2y+x<2x+y2 y+x<2 x+y. Both cases contradict the assumption that 2x+y2 x+y is minimal; the Lemma is proved.

To prove the problem statement, apply the Lemma for x=kx=k and y=2ny=2 n; the number 8kn−18 k n-1 divides (4k2−1)2\left(4 k^{2}-1\right)^{2} if and only if k=2nk=2 n. Hence, there is no such nn if kk is odd and n=k/2n=k / 2 is the only solution if kk is even.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.