Define the sequence by and
for . Prove that there are infinitely many such that
(This problem was suggested by Gabriel Carroll.)
, 2010
Solution
Our solution will be based upon the following key observation, for which we provide two different proofs.
Lemma 1. Let be a prime. If divides , then divides , where .
First proof of Lemma 1. We argue by induction on and then . First, the base case is vacuous. Now assume the claim holds for some , and suppose that there existed some smallest such that divides but does not divide . Consider the auxiliary sequence defined by . By the given, the sequence satisfies
Applying (1), we see that
so we may write
Notice that , so by the inductive hypothesis, we see that . Further, for any dividing but not , we have that , hence because and was chosen to be the smallest multiple of for which . Therefore, (2) shows that , a contradiction. This completes the induction, showing that if , then .
Second proof of Lemma 1. Let us interpret the sequence combinatorially as follows. Call a finite increasing sequence of integers good if and for each . Let be the number of good sequences whose last term is at most . Then, we claim that .
Indeed, for any , good sequences with second term and last term at most are in bijection with good sequences with last term at most ; here, the bijection is provided by dividing each term after the first by . Counting also the sequence consisting of the single term 1, we obtain the recurrence
Observe further that , meaning that the sequence satisfies the same recurrence and initial conditions as . Therefore, we obtain .
Now, note that is the number of good sequences whose last term is exactly . It suffices therefore to show that if is the highest power of dividing , then the number of good sequences ending in is divisible by . Let the -skeleton of a good sequence be the sub-sequence consisting of all the terms such that is not a power of (including the initial 1). It suffices for us to show that the number of good sequences ending in with a given -skeleton is divisible by .
Take any -skeleton, which we may write in the form
for some and satisfying , , , , and . Now, to form a good sequence ending in that has this -skeleton, between any two consecutive terms of the -skeleton we can insert any subset of the set
Also, if the last term is not equal to , we can insert any subset containing of
after it. Hence, for each , there is exactly one number of the form with that we can choose to include or not in our good sequence. For , we can choose to include the number if is not in the skeleton; otherwise including it is obligatory. So the number of good sequences ending in that have the given -skeleton is either or , depending whether or not is part of the skeleton; in any case, it is divisible by . It follows that the total number of good sequences ending in is divisible by , establishing the lemma.
We now consider the problem proper. For any positive integer , choose distinct primes . By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists some such that is divisible by for . By Lemma 1, this implies that is divisible by for , meaning that are all congruent modulo . For any , if we take , there exist positive integers and such that . In particular, this satisfies . Therefore, for any positive integer , the set of such that is unbounded, hence infinite. Taking gives the desired result.