Three workers must do a work completely. At first, one of them works as long as the other two would work together to complete one half of the work. Then another worker works as long as the other two would work together to complete one half of the work. Finally the third worker works as long as the other two would work together to complete one half of the work. With this, the whole work becomes completed. How many times faster would the work become completed if all the workers worked together?
Solutions — 2
Solution 1
Let the contributions of the first, second and third worker per a time unit be , measured as percentages of the whole work. One half of the work would be done by the second and third worker together within time units, by the third and first worker together within time units and, by the first and second worker together, within time units. By working in the way described in the problem text, they spend time units, but if they worked all together, they would spend time units. We are asked the ratio of these numbers. Since by assumption , we get
Solution 2
Suppose that the first worker worked time units, the second worker worked time units and the third worker worked time units. Altogether, they spend time units to perform the whole work. If the second worker worked time units and the third also time units, they would perform half of the work. Similarly, if the third worker worked time units and the first also time units then they would complete half of the work, and if the first worker worked time units and the second also time units, they would complete half of the work. Consequently, if the first worker worked time units, the second worker worked time units and the third worked time units, they would complete one and a half such works. Including the work really done, it turns out that if all workers worked time units then they would perform 2.5 such works. Thus the three workers together would act 2.5 times faster than in the situation of the problem.