Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Iranian Mathematical Olympiad /95 of 270

Iranian Mathematical Olympiad

Geometry Difficulty 6.3 National Olympiad Prove it Iran

Let PP and P′P' be two unequal regular nn-gons and AA and A′A' two points inside PP and P′P', respectively. Suppose {d1,d2,…,dn}\{d_1, d_2, \dots, d_n\} are the distances from AA to the vertices of PP and {d1′,d2′,…,dn′}\{d'_1, d'_2, \dots, d'_n\} are the distances from A′A' to the vertices of P′P'. Is it possible for {d1′,d2′,…,dn′}\{d'_1, d'_2, \dots, d'_n\} to be a permutation of {d1,d2,…,dn}\{d_1, d_2, \dots, d_n\}?

Solution

Suppose that P=P1P2…PnP = P_1P_2 \dots P_n, P′=P1′P2′…Pn′P' = P'_1P'_2 \dots P'_n and that APiAP_i's are a permutation of A′Pi′A'P'_i's. Let OO and O′O' be the centers of PP and P′P', respectively. Without loss of generality it can be assumed that AA is inside or on the perimeter of triangle OP1P2OP_1P_2 and AP1≤AP2AP_1 \le AP_2; A′A' is inside or on the perimeter of O′P1′P2′O'P'_1P'_2 and A′P1′≤A′P2′A'P'_1 \le A'P'_2. Using the following lemma APiAP_i's and A′Pi′A'P'_i's can be sorted in ascending order.

Lemma. In a situation as described above, if nn is odd, then
AP1≤AP2≤APn≤AP3≤APn−1≤AP4≤…≤APn+32−1≤APn+32+1≤APn+32, \begin{aligned} & AP_1 \le AP_2 \le AP_n \le AP_3 \le AP_{n-1} \le AP_4 \le \dots \\ & \le AP_{\frac{n+3}{2}-1} \le AP_{\frac{n+3}{2}+1} \le AP_{\frac{n+3}{2}}, \end{aligned}
and if nn is even, then
AP1≤AP2≤APn≤AP3≤⋯≤APn2+2≤APn2+1. AP_1 \le AP_2 \le AP_n \le AP_3 \le \dots \le AP_{\frac{n}{2}+2} \le AP_{\frac{n}{2}+1}.
Proof. The assertion can be easily proved by looking at the position of AA with respect to the perpendicular bisector of P2P_2 and PnP_n (which is OP1OP_1), then the perpendicular bisector of PnP_n and P3P_3, then the perpendicular bisector of P3P_3 and Pn−1P_{n-1} and so on.

It can be assumed that similar inequalities hold for A′Pi′A'P'_i's. So the problem statement is equivalent to,
AP1=A′P1′≤AP2=A′P2′≤APn=A′Pn′≤AP3=A′P3′≤… AP_1 = A'P'_1 \le AP_2 = A'P'_2 \le AP_n = A'P'_n \le AP_3 = A'P'_3 \le \dots
Assume that PP is greater than P′P'. For each 1≤i≤n1 \le i \le n, (Pn+1=P1P_{n+1} = P_1, Pn+1′=P1′P'_{n+1} = P'_1)
APi=A′Pi′, APi+1=A′Pi+1′, PiPi+1>Pi′Pi+1′⇒∠PiAPi+1>∠Pi′A′Pi+1′. \begin{aligned} & AP_i = A'P'_i,\ AP_{i+1} = A'P'_{i+1},\ P_iP_{i+1} > P'_iP'_{i+1} \\ & \qquad \Rightarrow \angle P_iAP_{i+1} > \angle P'_iA'P'_{i+1}. \end{aligned}
Hence
360∘=∑i=1n∠PiAPi+1>∑i=1n∠Pi′A′Pi+1′=360∘, 360^{\circ} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \angle P_i AP_{i+1} > \sum_{i=1}^{n} \angle P'_i A'P'_{i+1} = 360^{\circ},
which is a contradiction. This shows that PP and P′P' are equal.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.