a. It is sufficient to prove that 1+1=0. Consider x noninvertible, and let m∈N∗, such that x=x2+x3+⋯+x2m, and y=x+x2+⋯+x2m−1. Evidently, xy=x, so xyk=x, for any k∈N∗. Because x is not invertible it follows that y is also, so there is p∈N∗, such that −y=(−y)2+(−y)3+⋯+(−y)2p−1+(−y)2p=y2−y3+⋯−y2p−1+y2p. As a consequence −x=−xy=xy2−xy3+⋯−xy2p−1+xy2p=x−x+⋯−x+x=x, i.e., x+x=0.
Consider x non zero and non-invertible. As 2x=0, it follows that 2 is non-invertible, so 2+2=0 and 2=22+23+⋯+22m, where m∈N∗. The equality 2+2=0 implies 22=0, giving 2k=0, for any k≥2. So, 2=22+23+⋯+22m=0.
b. Let x be a non-invertible element of A and m∈N∗, such that x=x2+x3+⋯+x2m. Then x2=x3+x4+⋯+x2m+1. As 1+1=0, by summing up the two equalities we get x2m+1=x.
Equalities 1+1=0 and x2m+1=x imply (x2+x)2m=x2m+1+x2m=x2m+1⋅x2m−1+x2m=x⋅x2m−1+x2m=x2m+x2m=0.
We will show that x2+x=0, which concludes the proof. Let y=x2+x and take k the smallest positive integer such that yk=0 – the existence of k is assured by y2m=0. In case k>1, the element yk−1 is non-invertible in A and there is n∈N∗ such that yk−1=(yk−1)2n+1=y(k−1)(2n+1). Because (k−1)(2n+1)≥k, we infer y(k−1)(2n+1)=0, so yk−1=0 – in contradiction with the minimality of k. We conclude k=1 and y=0.