Solution:
I claim the answer is 120. First, note that 120=23⋅3⋅5, so the sum of divisors is (1+2+4+8)(1+3)(1+5)=15⋅4⋅6=360. Thus, we need to split the divisors into groups summing to 120. But then we can just take {120}, {20,40,60}, {1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12,15,24,30}. Thus, 120 works.
Now we need to show 120 is the lowest. Let s(n) be the sum of divisors. Since n will be in one of the piles, we need s(n)≥3n. First, we claim that n must have at least 3 distinct prime divisors. Surely, if it had 2 distinct prime divisors, say p and q, so that n=paqb, then the sum of divisors is
(1+p+p2+…+pa)(1+q+q2+…+qb)=paqb(1+p1+…+pa1)(1+q1+…+qb1)
However, the expression 1+p1+…+pa1 is maximized when p is minimized, and further, as a is finite, must be at most 1−p11=p−1p. Thus, the sum of divisors is less than
paqbp−1pq−1q≤n⋅2⋅23=3n
Thus, n can't have 2 distinct prime divisors and must have at least 3 distinct prime divisors.
As we already discovered 120 works, we need not worry about 4 distinct prime divisors, as the value of n would be at least 2⋅3⋅5⋅7=210. We now work through the numbers with 3 distinct divisors. If 2 is not one of them, then the only number that works is 105=3⋅5⋅7, which has a sum of divisors that is not large enough. Therefore, 2 must be a prime divisor of n. Additionally, if 3 is not a divisor, then our options are 2⋅5⋅7 and 2⋅5⋅11, which also do not work. Therefore, 3 must also be a prime divisor. Then, if 5 is not a prime divisor, then if n is 2⋅3⋅p, it has a sum of divisors of (1+2)(1+3)(1+p)=n⋅23⋅34⋅pp+1, which is only at least 3n if p is exactly 2, which is not feasible. Additionally, if we use 22, then the sum of divisors is (1+2+4)(1+3)(1+p)=n⋅47⋅34⋅p+1p, so pp+1>79⟹p<4.5, which also can't happen. Further, we can't have 32 be a divisor of n as 2⋅32⋅5 is the only value less than 120 with this, and that also does not work. Lastly, we just need to check 23⋅3⋅p, which has a sum of divisors of (1+2+4+8)(1+3)(1+p)=n⋅815⋅34⋅pp+1=n⋅25⋅p+1p, so p=5 and that works. This means that n=120 is the smallest value for which s(n)≥3n, and thus is our answer.