Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Bay Area Mathematical Olympiad /57 of 79

Bay Area Mathematical Olympiad

Number theory Difficulty 7.3 National Olympiad, round 2 Prove it United States

Problem:

a. Find two quadruples of positive integers (a,b,c,n)(a, b, c, n), each with a different value of nn greater than 33, such that
ab+bc+ca=n \frac{a}{b} + \frac{b}{c} + \frac{c}{a} = n

b. Show that if a,b,ca, b, c are nonzero integers such that ab+bc+ca\frac{a}{b} + \frac{b}{c} + \frac{c}{a} is an integer, then abca b c is a perfect cube. (A perfect cube is a number of the form n3n^3, where nn is an integer.)

Solution

Solution:

a.
For example, (1,2,4,5)(1, 2, 4, 5) and (9,2,12,6)(9, 2, 12, 6) work.

b.
Before solving the problem, we establish a useful definition and lemma.

If pp is a prime and xx is a nonzero rational number, we define ord⁡px\operatorname{ord}_p x to be the unique integer kk such that p−kxp^{-k} x is an integer not divisible by pp. For example, ord⁡345=2\operatorname{ord}_3 45 = 2 and ord⁡5115=−1\operatorname{ord}_5 \frac{11}{5} = -1. Then we claim the following:

Lemma. Let pp be prime and let x,yx, y be nonzero rational numbers. Then:

(i) ord⁡p(xy)=ord⁡px+ord⁡py\operatorname{ord}_p(xy) = \operatorname{ord}_p x + \operatorname{ord}_p y.

(ii) ord⁡p(x/y)=ord⁡px−ord⁡py\operatorname{ord}_p(x / y) = \operatorname{ord}_p x - \operatorname{ord}_p y.

(iii) If ord⁡px<ord⁡py\operatorname{ord}_p x < \operatorname{ord}_p y, then ord⁡p(x+y)=ord⁡px\operatorname{ord}_p(x + y) = \operatorname{ord}_p x.

Proof of the lemma. Parts (i)-(ii) are straightforward. For part (iii), let k=ord⁡pxk = \operatorname{ord}_p x and k+ℓ=ord⁡pyk + \ell = \operatorname{ord}_p y, where we assume ℓ>0\ell > 0. Then p−kx=np^{-k} x = n and p−k−ℓy=mp^{-k-\ell} y = m for some integers m,nm, n not divisible by pp. It follows that p−k(x+y)=n+pℓmp^{-k}(x + y) = n + p^{\ell} m, and this is an integer not divisible by pp. Thus ord⁡p(x+y)=k\operatorname{ord}_p(x + y) = k as claimed, proving the lemma.

Now we turn to the problem.

Suppose a,b,ca, b, c are integers such that a/b+b/c+c/aa / b + b / c + c / a is an integer. We will show that ord⁡p(abc)\operatorname{ord}_p(a b c) is a multiple of 33 for all primes pp, which implies that abca b c is a perfect cube.

Let pp be a prime and let r=ord⁡par = \operatorname{ord}_p a, s=ord⁡pbs = \operatorname{ord}_p b, t=ord⁡pct = \operatorname{ord}_p c. By part (i) of the lemma, ord⁡p(abc)=r+s+t\operatorname{ord}_p(a b c) = r + s + t.

By part (ii) of the lemma, we have ord⁡p(a/b)=r−s\operatorname{ord}_p(a / b) = r - s, ord⁡p(b/c)=s−t\operatorname{ord}_p(b / c) = s - t, and ord⁡p(c/a)=t−r\operatorname{ord}_p(c / a) = t - r. If these three differences are 00, then r=s=tr = s = t and r+s+tr + s + t is trivially a multiple of 33. Otherwise, the least of r−s,s−t,t−rr - s, s - t, t - r is negative and the greatest is positive (since their sum is 00).

We now claim that at least two of r−s,s−t,t−rr - s, s - t, t - r must be tied for least. If this is not true, then, by applying part (iii) of the lemma, we may conclude that ord⁡p(a/b+b/c+c/a)=min⁡{r−s,s−t,t−r}<0\operatorname{ord}_p(a / b + b / c + c / a) = \min \{ r - s, s - t, t - r \} < 0, which contradicts the assumption that a/b+b/c+c/aa / b + b / c + c / a is an integer. Thus we have proven our claim. But if two of r−s,s−t,t−rr - s, s - t, t - r are equal, then r,s,tr, s, t (in some order) form an arithmetic progression, and r+s+tr + s + t is three times the middle term of the progression. Thus we have shown that r+s+tr + s + t is a multiple of 33; in other words, ord⁡p(abc)\operatorname{ord}_p(a b c) is a multiple of 33 for all primes pp, and we are finished.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.