Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Team Selection Test for EGMO /8 of 15

Team Selection Test for EGMO, 2024

Algebra Difficulty 8.1 Shortlist Prove it Turkey

Let (an)n=1∞(a_n)_{n=1}^{\infty} be a strictly increasing sequence of positive real numbers such that the inequality
an(an−2an−1)+an−1(an−1−2an−2)≥0 a_n(a_n - 2a_{n-1}) + a_{n-1}(a_{n-1} - 2a_{n-2}) \ge 0
holds for all n≥3n \ge 3. Prove that for all n≥2n \ge 2 the inequality
an≥an−1+an−2+⋯+a1 a_n \ge a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + \dots + a_1
holds as well.

Solutions — 2

Solution 1

Rearranging the condition, we obtain (an−an−1)2≥2an−1an−2(a_n - a_{n-1})^2 \ge 2a_{n-1}a_{n-2} and since the sequence is increasing we have an≥an−1+2an−1an−2a_n \ge a_{n-1} + \sqrt{2a_{n-1}a_{n-2}}. The inequality will be proved by induction over nn.

For the base cases n=2,3n=2,3 using the monotonicity we have a2≥a1a_2 \ge a_1 and a3≥a2+2a2a1>a2+a1a_3 \ge a_2 + \sqrt{2a_2a_1} > a_2 + a_1.

Assume that the assertion is true for 2,…,n−12, \dots, n-1. There are two possible cases:

If an−1<2an−2a_{n-1} < 2a_{n-2}, then we have an≥an−1+2an−1an−2≥2an−1a_n \ge a_{n-1} + \sqrt{2a_{n-1}a_{n-2}} \ge 2a_{n-1} and from the induction hypothesis we obtain an≥2an−1≥a_n \ge 2a_{n-1} \ge
an−1+an−2+⋯+a1. a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + \dots + a_1.
If an−1≥2an−2a_{n-1} \ge 2a_{n-2}, then we have an≥an−1+2an−1an−2≥an−1+2an−2a_n \ge a_{n-1} + \sqrt{2a_{n-1}a_{n-2}} \ge a_{n-1} + 2a_{n-2} and from the induction hypothesis we obtain an≥an−1+2an−2≥an−1+an−2+⋯+a1a_n \ge a_{n-1} + 2a_{n-2} \ge a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + \dots + a_1.

We are done.

Solution 2

We will again use induction. Cases n=2,3n=2,3 are covered in Solution 1. Assume that the assertion is true for n=1,2,…,kn=1,2,\dots,k, we will prove that it is true for n=k+1n=k+1. On the contrary, assume that ak+1<a1+⋯+aka_{k+1} < a_1 + \dots + a_k. Then, we have a1+⋯+ak−1>ak+1−aka_1 + \dots + a_{k-1} > a_{k+1} - a_k. Since both sides are positive, we can take squares and use the problem condition to get
(a1+⋯+ak−1)2>(ak+1−ak)2≥2akak−1 (a_1 + \dots + a_{k-1})^2 > (a_{k+1} - a_k)^2 \ge 2a_k a_{k-1}
From the inductive hypothesis we know that ak≥a1+⋯+ak−1a_k \ge a_1 + \dots + a_{k-1}. Combining last two inequalities we get
a1+⋯+ak−1>2ak−1 or a1+⋯+ak−2>ak−1, a_1 + \dots + a_{k-1} > 2a_{k-1} \text{ or } a_1 + \dots + a_{k-2} > a_{k-1},
which contradicts to the inductive hypothesis. Thus,
ak+1≥a1+⋯+ak. a_{k+1} \ge a_1 + \dots + a_k.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.