Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / IMO China National Team Selection Test /6 of 8

IMO China National Team Selection Test

Algebra Difficulty 8.9 Shortlist Prove it China

Given positive integers m,nm, n and non-negative real numbers a0,a1,…,am,b0,b1,…,bna_0, a_1, \dots, a_m, b_0, b_1, \dots, b_n. Define
ck=max⁡i+j=kaibj(k=0,1,…,m+n). c_k = \max_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \quad (k = 0, 1, \dots, m+n).
Prove that:
c0+c1+⋯+cm+nm+n+1≥a0+a1+⋯+amm+1⋅b0+b1+⋯+bnn+1. \frac{c_0 + c_1 + \dots + c_{m+n}}{m+n+1} \ge \frac{a_0 + a_1 + \dots + a_m}{m+1} \cdot \frac{b_0 + b_1 + \dots + b_n}{n+1}.

Solutions — 2

Solution 1

Proof. Consider the set of points P={(i0,j0),(i1,j1),…,(im+n,jm+n)}\mathcal{P} = \{(i_0, j_0), (i_1, j_1), \dots, (i_{m+n}, j_{m+n})\} as a "monotone path" from (0,0)(0, 0) to (m,n)(m, n) if (i0,j0)=(0,0)(i_0, j_0) = (0, 0), (im+n,jm+n)=(m,n)(i_{m+n}, j_{m+n}) = (m, n), and for every index 0≤k<m+n0 \le k < m + n, we have
(ik+1,jk+1)∈{(ik+1,jk),(ik,jk+1)}. (i_{k+1}, j_{k+1}) \in \{(i_k + 1, j_k), (i_k, j_k + 1)\}.
Given two non-negative decreasing sequences u0≥u1≥⋯≥umu_0 \ge u_1 \ge \dots \ge u_m and v0≥v1≥⋯≥vnv_0 \ge v_1 \ge \dots \ge v_n, define the weight of the monotone path P\mathcal{P} as
W(P)=∑k=0m+nuikvjk. W(\mathcal{P}) = \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} u_{i_k} v_{j_k}.
Lemma: There exists a monotone path P\mathcal{P} such that
W(P)≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)(∑i=0mui)(∑j=0nvj). W(\mathcal{P}) \ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)} \left(\sum_{i=0}^m u_i\right) \left(\sum_{j=0}^n v_j\right).
Proof of the Lemma: We use induction on m+nm+n. When m=0m=0 or n=0n=0, the conclusion is trivial. Assume the lemma holds for m+n<km+n < k. Consider the case m+n=km+n = k with m,n>0m, n > 0. Let
S=max⁡monotone path PW(P). S = \max_{\text{monotone path } \mathcal{P}} W(\mathcal{P}).
By the induction hypothesis, for the sequences u0≥u1≥⋯≥um−1u_0 \ge u_1 \ge \dots \ge u_{m-1} and v0≥v1≥⋯≥vnv_0 \ge v_1 \ge \dots \ge v_n, there exists a monotone path P0\mathcal{P}_0 from (0,0)(0, 0) to (m−1,n)(m-1, n) such that
W(P0)≥(m−1)+n+1m(n+1)(∑i=0m−1ui)(∑j=0nvj). W(\mathcal{P}_0) \ge \frac{(m-1)+n+1}{m(n+1)} \left(\sum_{i=0}^{m-1} u_i\right) \left(\sum_{j=0}^n v_j\right).
Let P\mathcal{P} be the monotone path obtained by adding (m,n)(m, n) to P0\mathcal{P}_0, then
S≥W(P)=W(P0)+umvn≥(m−1)+n+1m(n+1)(∑i=0m−1ui)(∑j=0nvj)+umvn.(10) S \ge W(\mathcal{P}) = W(\mathcal{P}_0) + u_m v_n \ge \frac{(m-1)+n+1}{m(n+1)} \left(\sum_{i=0}^{m-1} u_i\right) \left(\sum_{j=0}^n v_j\right) + u_m v_n. \quad (10)
Similarly, for the sequences u0≥u1≥⋯≥umu_0 \ge u_1 \ge \dots \ge u_m and v0≥v1≥⋯≥vn−1v_0 \ge v_1 \ge \dots \ge v_{n-1}, by the induction hypothesis, we have
S≥m+(n−1)+1(m+1)n(∑i=0mui)(∑j=0n−1vj)+umvn.(11) S \ge \frac{m+(n-1)+1}{(m+1)n} \left(\sum_{i=0}^m u_i\right) \left(\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} v_j\right) + u_m v_n. \quad (11)
Let U=u0+⋯+umU = u_0 + \dots + u_m and V=v0+⋯+vnV = v_0 + \dots + v_n. Multiplying (10) by mm+n\frac{m}{m+n} and adding it to (11) multiplied by nm+n\frac{n}{m+n}, we get
S≥1n+1(U−um)V+1m+1U(V−vn)+umvn=m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)UV+(Um+1−um)(Vn+1−vn)≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)UV, \begin{align*} S &\ge \frac{1}{n+1}(U - u_m)V + \frac{1}{m+1}U(V - v_n) + u_m v_n \\ &= \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)}UV + \left(\frac{U}{m+1} - u_m\right)\left(\frac{V}{n+1} - v_n\right) \\ &\ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)}UV, \end{align*}
thereby completing the proof of the lemma.

Returning to the proof of the stated inequality. Sort {ai}\{a_i\} as u0≥u1≥⋯≥umu_0 \ge u_1 \ge \dots \ge u_m, and sort {bj}\{b_j\} as v0≥v1≥⋯≥vnv_0 \ge v_1 \ge \dots \ge v_n. There exists a permutation π\pi of {0,1,…,m}\{0, 1, \dots, m\} such that for each index ii, ui=aπ(i)u_i = a_{\pi(i)}; similarly, there exists a permutation σ\sigma of {0,1,…,n}\{0, 1, \dots, n\} such that for each index jj, vj=bσ(j)v_j = b_{\sigma(j)}.
By the lemma, there exists a monotone path P={(i0,j0),(i1,j1),…,(im+n,jm+n)}\mathcal{P} = \{(i_0, j_0), (i_1, j_1), \dots, (i_{m+n}, j_{m+n})\} from (0,0) to (m,n) such that
W(P)≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)UV. W(\mathcal{P}) \ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)} UV.
From the definition of a monotone path, for each index k∈{0,1,…,m+n}k \in \{0, 1, \dots, m+n\} we have
#{i0,i1,…,ik}=ik+1,#{j0,j1,…,jk}=jk+1, \#\{i_0, i_1, \dots, i_k\} = i_k + 1, \quad \#\{j_0, j_1, \dots, j_k\} = j_k + 1,
hence
#{π(i0),…,π(ik)}+#{σ(j0),…,σ(jk)}=ik+jk+2=k+2. \#\{\pi(i_0), \dots, \pi(i_k)\} + \#\{\sigma(j_0), \dots, \sigma(j_k)\} = i_k + j_k + 2 = k + 2.
For finite non-empty sets of real numbers XX and YY, we have ∣X+Y∣≥∣X∣+∣Y∣−1|X + Y| \ge |X| + |Y| - 1. Let Σk={π(i0),…,π(ik)}+{σ(j0),…,σ(jk)}\Sigma_k = \{\pi(i_0), \dots, \pi(i_k)\} + \{\sigma(j_0), \dots, \sigma(j_k)\}, then Σk⊆{0,1,…,m+n}\Sigma_k \subseteq \{0, 1, \dots, m+n\} and ∣Σk∣≥k+1|\Sigma_k| \ge k + 1. Thus, we can sequentially choose
τ(0)∈Σ0,τ(k)∈Σk∖{τ(0),τ(1),…,τ(k−1)},∀1≤k≤m+n. \tau(0) \in \Sigma_0, \quad \tau(k) \in \Sigma_k \setminus \{\tau(0), \tau(1), \dots, \tau(k-1)\}, \quad \forall 1 \le k \le m+n.
Since τ(0),…,τ(m+n)\tau(0), \dots, \tau(m+n) are distinct and between 0 and m+nm+n, they form a permutation of {0,1,…,m+n}\{0, 1, \dots, m+n\}. For each kk, let τ(k)=π(ip)+σ(jq)\tau(k) = \pi(i_p) + \sigma(j_q), where p,q≤kp, q \le k. From the definition of c∗c_*, we have
cτ(k)≥aπ(ip)bσ(jq)=uipvjq≥uikvjk, c_{\tau(k)} \ge a_{\pi(i_p)} b_{\sigma(j_q)} = u_{i_p} v_{j_q} \ge u_{i_k} v_{j_k},
thus,
∑k=0m+nck=∑k=0m+ncτ(k)≥∑k=0m+nuikvjk=W(P)≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)UV, \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} c_k = \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} c_{\tau(k)} \ge \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} u_{i_k} v_{j_k} = W(\mathcal{P}) \ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)} UV,
which proves the desired inequality. □\square

Solution 2

Proof 2 (Based on the solution by Junfeng Tian). Consider the set of points P={(i0,j0),(i1,j1),…,(im+n,jm+n)}\mathcal{P} = \{(i_0, j_0), (i_1, j_1), \dots, (i_{m+n}, j_{m+n})\} as a "monotone path" from (0,0) to (m,n) if (i0,j0)=(0,0)(i_0, j_0) = (0,0), (im+n,jm+n)=(m,n)(i_{m+n}, j_{m+n}) = (m,n), and for every index 0≤k<m+n0 \le k < m+n, we have
(ik+1,jk+1)∈{(ik+1,jk),(ik,jk+1)}. (i_{k+1}, j_{k+1}) \in \{(i_k + 1, j_k), (i_k, j_k + 1)\}.
Noting that ik+jk=ki_k + j_k = k, we get
∑k=0m+naikbjk≤∑k=0m+ncik+jk=∑k=0m+nck. \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} a_{i_k} b_{j_k} \le \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} c_{i_k + j_k} = \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} c_k.
We call the left-hand side of the above expression the weight of the monotone path P\mathcal{P}, denoted as W(P)W(\mathcal{P}). To prove the conclusion, we only need to prove the following proposition (∗*): There exists a monotone path P\mathcal{P} such that
W(P)≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)∑i=0mai∑j=0nbj. W(\mathcal{P}) \ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)} \sum_{i=0}^m a_i \sum_{j=0}^n b_j.
First, establish the following lemma: Let 0≤x,y≤10 \le x, y \le 1, then
xy+max⁡{m+nm(n+1)(1−x),m+n(m+1)n(1−y)}≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1). xy + \max \left\{ \frac{m+n}{m(n+1)}(1-x), \frac{m+n}{(m+1)n}(1-y) \right\} \ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)}.
Proof of the lemma: Let the left-hand side of the above expression be LL. By symmetry, assume m+nm(n+1)(1−x)≥m+n(m+1)n(1−y)\frac{m+n}{m(n+1)}(1-x) \ge \frac{m+n}{(m+1)n}(1-y), then
y≥1−(m+1)nm(n+1)(1−x). y \ge 1 - \frac{(m+1)n}{m(n+1)}(1-x).
Combining with the fact that xx is non-negative, we get
L≥x(1−(m+1)nm(n+1)(1−x))+m+nm(n+1)(1−x)=m+n+1(m+1)(n+1)+nm(m+1)(n+1)((m+1)x−1)2≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1), \begin{aligned} L &\ge x \left(1 - \frac{(m+1)n}{m(n+1)}(1-x)\right) + \frac{m+n}{m(n+1)}(1-x) \\ &= \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)} + \frac{n}{m(m+1)(n+1)}((m+1)x - 1)^2 \\ &\ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)}, \end{aligned}
thereby completing the proof of the lemma.

Returning to the proof of proposition (∗)(*). We use induction on m+nm+n. When m=0m=0 or n=0n=0, the proposition is clearly true. Assume the proposition holds for m+n<ℓm+n < \ell, consider the case m+n=ℓm+n = \ell with m,n>0m, n > 0. By homogeneity, assume ∑i=0mai=∑j=0nbj=1\sum_{i=0}^m a_i = \sum_{j=0}^n b_j = 1, then 0≤a0,b0≤10 \le a_0, b_0 \le 1. Let
S=max⁡monotone path PW(P). S = \max_{\text{monotone path } \mathcal{P}} W(\mathcal{P}).
By the induction hypothesis, there exists a monotone path P0P_0 from (1,0)(1,0) to (m,n)(m,n) such that
W(P0)≥m+nm(n+1)∑i=1mai∑j=0nbj=m+nm(n+1)(1−a0). W(P_0) \ge \frac{m+n}{m(n+1)} \sum_{i=1}^m a_i \sum_{j=0}^n b_j = \frac{m+n}{m(n+1)}(1-a_0).
Let P\mathcal{P} be the monotone path obtained by going from (0,0)(0,0) to (1,0)(1,0) and then following P0P_0, then
S≥W(P)=a0b0+m+nm(n+1)(1−a0). S \ge W(\mathcal{P}) = a_0 b_0 + \frac{m+n}{m(n+1)}(1-a_0).
Similarly, consider going from (0,0)(0,0) to (0,1)(0,1) and then using the induction hypothesis, we get
S≥a0b0+m+n(m+1)n(1−b0). S \ge a_0 b_0 + \frac{m+n}{(m+1)n}(1-b_0).
Combining these two expressions and using the lemma, we get
S≥a0b0+max⁡{m+nm(n+1)(1−a0),m+n(m+1)n(1−b0)}≥m+n+1(m+1)(n+1), S \ge a_0 b_0 + \max \left\{ \frac{m+n}{m(n+1)}(1-a_0), \frac{m+n}{(m+1)n}(1-b_0) \right\} \ge \frac{m+n+1}{(m+1)(n+1)},
which completes the proof. □\Box

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.