We prove the statement in two steps:
(1) Prove by mathematical induction that:
2i=1∑naik≤(an+1)kan.(1)
Proof: When n=1, it is easy to see that Eq. (1) holds.
Assume that when n=m, Eq. (1) holds, that is
2i=1∑maik≤(am+1)kam.
Then when n=m+1,
2i=1∑m+1aik=2i=1∑maik+2am+1k≤(am+1)kam+2am+1k≤am+1k(am+1−1)+2am+1k=am+1k(am+1+1)≤(am+1+1)kam+1.
(2) Next, prove that the statement holds by mathematical induction.
When n=1, it is easy to see that the statement holds.
Assume that when n=m, the statement holds, that is
(i=1∑maik)2≤i=1∑mai2k+1.
(i=1∑m+1aik)2=(i=1∑maik)2+2(i=1∑maik)am+1k+am+12k≤i=1∑mai2k+1+2(i=1∑maik)am+1k+am+12k≤i=1∑mai2k+1+(am+1)kamam+1k+am+12k(by Eq. (1))≤i=1∑mai2k+1+am+1k(am+1k(am+1−1)+am+1k)≤i=1∑m+1ai2k+1.
Combining the above, the statement holds.