The required integral part is 0. The difference of the two sums is positive, since positivity clearly holds termwise.
To show it less than 1, let uk=nk/k!, k=0,1,2,…, and express the two sums in terms of the uk. The first sum is (un+1+⋯+u2n−1)/un, and the second is (u0+⋯+un−2)/un−1. Notice that un−1=un to write the difference of the two in the form
1−unu2n+un1k=1∑n(un+k−un−k).
It is therefore sufficient to prove that ∑k=1nun+k<∑k=1nun−k. To this end, we will show that
k=1∑nkun+k<k=1∑nkun−kandk=1∑n(m−k)un+k<k=1∑n(m−k)un−k(∗)
for some m in the range 1,2,…,n. Addition of the two inequalities (∗) yields the desired inequality.
The first inequality (∗) is equivalent to ∑k=02n(k−n)uk<0. To establish the latter, simply notice that ∑k=02nkuk=n∑k=02n−1uk<n∑k=02nuk.
To establish the second inequality (∗), discard the trivial case n=2 and let n≥3. Write
un−kun+k⋅un+k+1un−k−1=1+n1−n2k(k+1),k=0,1,…,n,
to infer that, as a function of k, the ratio un+k/un−k is strictly decreasing for k(k+1)<n and strictly increasing for k(k+1)>n; the situation at the possible case k(k+1)=n causes no trouble. Since un+1/un−1=n/(n+1)<1, and u2n/u0=n2n/(2n)!>1 for n≥3, there exists m in the range 1,2,…,n such that un+k<un−k for 1≤k<m, and un+k>un−k for m<k≤n. Consequently, the second inequality (∗) holds termwise for k=m. This ends the proof.