Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / /3 of 11

, 2012

Combinatorics Difficulty 8.1 Shortlist Prove it Balkan Mathematical Olympiad

Suppose that mm is a positive integer. Let Pm={2m,2m13,2m232,,3m}P_m = \{2^m, 2^{m-1}3, 2^{m-2}3^2, \dots, 3^m\}. If XX is a subset of PmP_m, we write SXS_X for the sum of all elements of XX, with the convention that S=0S_\emptyset = 0 where \emptyset is the empty set. Suppose that yy is a real number with 0y3m+12m+10 \le y \le 3^{m+1} - 2^{m+1}. Prove that there is a subset YY of PmP_m such that 0ySY<2m0 \le y - S_Y < 2^m.

Solutions — 2

Solution 1

Let α=3/2\alpha = 3/2 so 1+α>α21 + \alpha > \alpha^2.
Given yy, we construct YY algorithmically. Let Y=Y = \emptyset and of course S=0S_\emptyset = 0. For i=0i = 0 to mm, perform the following operation:
If SY+2i3miyS_Y + 2^i 3^{m-i} \le y, then replace YY by Y{2i3mi}Y \cup \{2^i 3^{m-i}\}.
When this process is finished, we have a subset YY of PmP_m such that SYyS_Y \le y.
Notice that the elements of PmP_m are in ascending order of size as given, and may alternatively be described as 2m,2mα,2mα2,,2mαm2^m, 2^m\alpha, 2^m\alpha^2, \dots, 2^m\alpha^m. If any member of this list is not in YY, then no two consecutive members of the list to the left of the omitted member can both be in YY. This is because 1+α>α21 + \alpha > \alpha^2, and the greedy nature of the process used to construct YY.
Therefore either Y=PmY = P_m, in which case y=3m+12m+1y = 3^{m+1} - 2^{m+1} and all is well, or at least one of the two leftmost elements of the list is omitted from YY.
If 2m2^m is not omitted from YY, then the algorithmic process ensures that (SY2m)+2m13>y(S_Y - 2^m) + 2^{m-1}3 > y, and so ySY<2my - S_Y < 2^m. On the other hand, if 2m2^m is omitted from YY, then ySY<2my - S_Y < 2^m.

Solution 2

Note that 3m+12m+1=(32)(3m+3m12++32m1+2m)=SPm3^{m+1} - 2^{m+1} = (3-2)(3^m + 3^{m-1} \cdot 2 + \dots + 3 \cdot 2^{m-1} + 2^m) = S_{P_m}. Dividing every element of PmP_m by 2m2^m gives us the following equivalent problem:
Let mm be a positive integer, a=3/2a = 3/2, and Qm={1,a,a2,,am}Q_m = \{1, a, a^2, \dots, a^m\}. Show that for any real number xx satisfying 0x1+a+a2++am0 \le x \le 1 + a + a^2 + \dots + a^m, there exists a subset XX of QmQ_m such that 0xSX<10 \le x - S_X < 1.
We will prove this problem by induction on mm. When m=1m = 1, S=0S_\emptyset = 0, S{1}=1S_{\{1\}} = 1, S{a}=3/2S_{\{a\}} = 3/2, S{1,a}=5/2S_{\{1,a\}} = 5/2. Since the difference between any two consecutive of them is at most 1, the claim is true.
Suppose that the statement is true for positive integer mm. Let xx be a real number with 0x1+a+a2++am+10 \le x \le 1 + a + a^2 + \dots + a^{m+1}. If 0x1+a+a2++am0 \le x \le 1 + a + a^2 + \dots + a^m, then by the induction hypothesis there exists a subset XX of QmQm+1Q_m \subset Q_{m+1} such that 0xSX<10 \le x - S_X < 1.
If am+11a1=1+a+a2++am<x\frac{a^{m+1} - 1}{a - 1} = 1 + a + a^2 + \dots + a^m < x, then x>am+1x > a^{m+1} as
am+11a1=2(am+11)=am+1+(am+12)am+1+a22=am+1+14. \frac{a^{m+1} - 1}{a - 1} = 2(a^{m+1} - 1) = a^{m+1} + (a^{m+1} - 2) \ge a^{m+1} + a^2 - 2 = a^{m+1} + \frac{1}{4}.
Therefore 0<(xam+1)1+a+a2++am0 < (x - a^{m+1}) \le 1 + a + a^2 + \dots + a^m. Again by the induction hypothesis, there exists a subset XX of QmQ_m satisfying 0(xam+1)SX<10 \le (x - a^{m+1}) - S_X < 1. Hence 0xSX<10 \le x - S_{X'} < 1 where X=X{am+1}Qm+1X' = X \cup \{a^{m+1}\} \subset Q_{m+1}.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.