Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Taiwan IMO Selection Camp /332 of 359

Taiwan IMO Selection Camp, 2021

Number theory Difficulty 7.1 National Olympiad, round 2 Prove it Taiwan

(a) Show that for any two coprime positive integers a,ba, b, there always exist positive integers x,yx, y such that axn+bynax^n + by^n is nn-good.
(b) Show that for any kk positive integers a1,…,aka_1, \dots, a_k satisfying gcd⁡(a1,…,ak)=1\gcd(a_1, \dots, a_k) = 1, there always exist positive integers x1,…,xkx_1, \dots, x_k such that a1x1n+a2x2n+⋯+akxkna_1x_1^n + a_2x_2^n + \dots + a_kx_k^n is nn-good. (Remark: a1,…,aka_1, \dots, a_k need not be pairwise distinct.)

Problem:
II-N. Let nn be a given positive integer. We say that a positive integer mm is nn-good if and only if there are at most 2n2n distinct primes pp satisfying p2∣mp^2 \mid m.
(a) Show that if two positive integers a,ba, b are coprime, then there exist positive integers x,yx, y so that axn+bynax^n + by^n is nn-good.
(b) Show that for any kk positive integers a1,…,aka_1, \dots, a_k satisfying gcd(a1,…,ak)=1\text{gcd}(a_1, \dots, a_k) = 1, there exist positive integers x1,…,xkx_1, \dots, x_k so that a1x1n+a2x2n+⋯+akxkna_1x_1^n + a_2x_2^n + \dots + a_kx_k^n is nn-good.
*(Remark. a1,…,aka_1, \dots, a_k are not necessarily pairwise distinct.)*

Solution

Solution. We first prove (a). Let N,C1,C2N, C_1, C_2 be some positive integers to be determined. Let PP be the product of all primes at most max⁡{a,b,2n+4}\max\{a, b, 2n+4\}. Let S1={Pn+C1:n∈[N]}S_1 = \{Pn + C_1 : n \in [N]\} and S2={Pn+C2:n∈[N]}S_2 = \{Pn + C_2 : n \in [N]\}. For each prime p∈(max⁡{a,b,2n+4},N)p \in (\max\{a, b, 2n+4\}, \sqrt{N}), we first count the number of (x,y)∈S1×S2(x, y) \in S_1 \times S_2 that satisfies p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n + by^n. For each y∈S2y \in S_2, if p∣yp \mid y, then we also need p∣xp \mid x, showing that there are at most (N/p+1)(N/p + 1) values for xx in S1S_1 such that p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n + by^n (here we use the fact that gcd⁡(p,P)=1\gcd(p, P) = 1). If p∤yp \nmid y, then we know that there are at most nn roots for axn+byn≡0(modp)ax^n + by^n \equiv 0 \pmod{p}. Since p∤np \nmid n, each solution modulo pp lifts uniquely to a solution modulo p2p^2, showing that there are at most n(N/p2+1)n(N/p^2 + 1) values for xx in S1S_1 such that p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n + by^n (here we use the fact that gcd⁡(p,P)=1\gcd(p, P) = 1 once again). Therefore, in total, there are at most
(Np+1)2+(N−Np−1)⋅n(Np2+1)<(2n+4)N2p2 \left(\frac{N}{p} + 1\right)^2 + \left(N - \frac{N}{p} - 1\right) \cdot n \left(\frac{N}{p^2} + 1\right) < \frac{(2n + 4)N^2}{p^2}
pairs of (x,y)∈S1×S2(x, y) \in S_1 \times S_2 that satisfy p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n + by^n. Since we know that
∑i=2n+5∞1i(i−1)=∑i=2n+5∞(1i−1−1i)=12n+4, \sum_{i=2n+5}^{\infty} \frac{1}{i(i-1)} = \sum_{i=2n+5}^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{i-1} - \frac{1}{i} \right) = \frac{1}{2n+4},
we have that
∑prime p≥2n+52n+4p2<∑i=2n+5∞2n+4i(i−1)=1. \sum_{\text{prime } p \ge 2n+5} \frac{2n+4}{p^2} < \sum_{i=2n+5}^{\infty} \frac{2n+4}{i(i-1)} = 1.
As a consequence, we know that for every C1,C2,NC_1, C_2, N, there exists a pair (x,y)∈S1×S2(x, y) \in S_1 \times S_2 such that for any prime p∈(max⁡{a,b,2n+4},N)p \in (\max\{a, b, 2n+4\}, \sqrt{N}) we have p2∤axn+bynp^2 \nmid ax^n + by^n.
Next, we will choose C1,C2C_1, C_2 properly to deal with the case p≤max⁡{a,b,2n+4}p \le \max\{a, b, 2n+4\}. For each prime p≤max⁡{a,b,2n+4}p \le \max\{a, b, 2n+4\}, if p∤ap \nmid a then we can choose C1≡1(modp)C_1 \equiv 1 \pmod{p}

and C2≡0(modp)C_2 \equiv 0 \pmod{p}; otherwise, we know by the condition that p∤bp \nmid b, and so we can choose C1≡0(modp)C_1 \equiv 0 \pmod{p} and C2≡1(modp)C_2 \equiv 1 \pmod{p}. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we know that we can choose 1≤C1,C2≤P1 \le C_1, C_2 \le P such that the above conditions hold for all primes p≤max⁡{a,b,2n+4}p \le \max\{a, b, 2n+4\}. As a consequence, we now also have that for any prime p≤max⁡{a,b,2n+4}p \le \max\{a, b, 2n+4\} and any (x,y)∈S1×S2(x, y) \in S_1 \times S_2, we have p∤axn+bynp \nmid ax^n + by^n.
With this choice of C1,C2C_1, C_2, we know that for all NN, we can choose (x,y)∈S1×S2(x, y) \in S_1 \times S_2 such that p2∤axn+bynp^2 \nmid ax^n+by^n for all p<Np < \sqrt{N}. Note that axn+byn≤2max⁡{a,b}Pn(N+1)n<2n+1max⁡{a,b}PnNnax^n+by^n \le 2\max\{a, b\}P^n(N+1)^n < 2^{n+1} \max\{a, b\}P^n N^n, and also that if pp is a prime such that p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n+by^n then p≥Np \ge \sqrt{N}. We thus have the number of distinct primes pp satisfying p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n + by^n is at most
log⁡N2n+1max⁡{a,b}PnNn=2n+log⁡N2n+1max⁡{a,b}Pn, \log_{\sqrt{N}} 2^{n+1} \max\{a, b\}P^n N^n = 2n + \log_{\sqrt{N}} 2^{n+1} \max\{a, b\}P^n,
which is less than 2n+12n+1 if NN is large enough. Thus, we know that there exist x,y∈Nx, y \in \mathbb{N} such that there are at most 2n2n distinct primes pp that satisfy p2∣axn+bynp^2 \mid ax^n + by^n.
Now we use (a) to prove (b). For each prime factor pp of aka_k, we know that there exists i(p)∈[k−1]i(p) \in [k-1] so that p∤ai(p)p \nmid a_{i(p)}. We can thus set xj≡δi(p),j(modp)x_j \equiv \delta_{i(p),j} \pmod{p} so that p∤a1x1n+a2x2n+⋯+ak−1xk−1np \nmid a_1x_1^n + a_2x_2^n + \dots + a_{k-1}x_{k-1}^n. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we know that there exist positive integers x1,…,xk−1x_1, \dots, x_{k-1} such that xj≡δi(p),j(modp)x_j \equiv \delta_{i(p),j} \pmod{p} for all j∈[k−1]j \in [k-1] and prime factors pp of aka_k. Thus, we have that a1x1n+a2x2n+⋯+ak−1xk−1na_1x_1^n + a_2x_2^n + \dots + a_{k-1}x_{k-1}^n and aka_k are coprime. We can thus choose x,y∈Nx, y \in \mathbb{N} by (a) so that (a1x1n+⋯+ak−1xk−1n)xn+akyn(a_1x_1^n + \dots + a_{k-1}x_{k-1}^n)x^n + a_ky^n is nn-good. Therefore, a1(x1x)n+⋯+ak−1(xk−1x)n+akyna_1(x_1x)^n + \dots + a_{k-1}(x_{k-1}x)^n + a_ky^n is nn-good, as desired.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement translated into English from en; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.