First, we prove the following lemma.
Lemma. For any positive integers X,A and B with A=B we have
gcd(XA+A,XB+B)<AB+BA.
Proof of lemma. Note that XB+B divides XAB−(−B)A, and that
gcd(XA+A,(XA)B−(−B)A)=gcd(XA+A,(−A)B−(−B)A).
We now have two cases. If AB=BA, then (−A)B−(−B)A=0, and
gcd(XA+A,XB+B)≤∣(−A)B−(−B)A∣≤AB+BA.
The only other case is when (A,B)=(2,4) or (A,B)=(4,2). But here we can check it manually, since gcd(X2+2,X4+4)=gcd(X2+2,8)≤8. ■
Now, we claim that for every 1≤m<100 there exists a prime power Pm dividing Nm+m which does not divide any other Nc+c (for 1≤c<100). This will immediately solve the problem, because no two of the Pi can have a common factor.
Assume for contradiction this is not the case. Then for some m, it must be the case that
Nm+m≤k=m1≤k<100∏gcd(Nm+k,Nk+m)≤k=m1≤k<100∏(mk+km).
Let α be a real number such that m≤αm for all integers m. We may then write
N<1≤k<100k=m∏(mk+km)1/m<1≤k<100∏((m1/m)k+k)<1≤k<100∏(αk+k)=α49501≤k<100∏(1+αkk)<α4950⋅(1+99α1+α21+⋯+α9999)99
with the last line being AM-GM. If we take even the crude bound α=2 now, then we easily get an upper bound of 24950(1+992)100<25000, which is a contradiction. This concludes the proof.