Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / Romania — NMO Selection Tests for the Balkan and International Mathematical Olympiads /63 of 80

Romania — NMO Selection Tests for the Balkan and International Mathematical Olympiads

Combinatorics Difficulty 8.4 Shortlist Prove it Romania

Let nn be a positive integer. If σ\sigma is a permutation of the first nn positive integers, let S(σ)S(\sigma) be the set of all distinct sums of the form ∑i=kℓσ(i)\sum_{i=k}^{\ell} \sigma(i), where 1≤k≤ℓ≤n1 \le k \le \ell \le n.
a) Exhibit a permutation σ\sigma of the first nn positive integers such that ∣S(σ)∣≥⌊(n+1)2/4⌋|S(\sigma)| \ge \lfloor(n+1)^2/4\rfloor.
b) Show that ∣S(σ)∣>nn/42|S(\sigma)| > n\sqrt{n}/4\sqrt{2} for all permutations σ\sigma of the first nn positive integers.

Solution

a) We show that the permutation σ\sigma of the first nn positive integers, defined by σ(i)=(i+1)/2\sigma(i) = (i+1)/2 for each positive odd i≤ni \le n, and σ(i)=n−i/2+1\sigma(i) = n - i/2 + 1 for each positive even i≤ni \le n, satisfies the required condition.
More precisely, we show that the ⌊(n+1)2/4⌋\lfloor(n+1)^2/4\rfloor sums of the form ∑i=kℓσ(i)\sum_{i=k}^{\ell} \sigma(i), where 1≤k≤ℓ≤n1 \le k \le \ell \le n and k≡ℓ(mod2)k \equiv \ell \pmod 2, are pairwise distinct, so ∣S(σ)∣≥⌊(n+1)2/4⌋|S(\sigma)| \ge \lfloor(n+1)^2/4\rfloor.
Let 1≤k≤ℓ≤n1 \le k \le \ell \le n and k≡ℓ(mod2)k \equiv \ell \pmod 2, and notice that σ(i)+σ(i+1)=n+1\sigma(i) + \sigma(i+1) = n+1 for every positive odd i≤ni \le n, so
∑i=kℓσ(i)={(ℓ−k)(n+1)/2+σ(ℓ)if k is odd,σ(k)+(ℓ−k)(n+1)/2if k is even. \sum_{i=k}^{\ell} \sigma(i) = \begin{cases} (\ell-k)(n+1)/2 + \sigma(\ell) & \text{if } k \text{ is odd,} \\ \sigma(k) + (\ell-k)(n+1)/2 & \text{if } k \text{ is even.} \end{cases}
Since the absolute value of an integer of the form σ(i)−σ(j)\sigma(i) - \sigma(j) is less than nn, the above formula shows that the assignment (k,ℓ)↦∑i=kℓσ(i)(k, \ell) \mapsto \sum_{i=k}^{\ell} \sigma(i) is indeed injective on the pairs in question.

b) Let σ\sigma be a permutation of the first nn positive integers, and split S(σ)S(\sigma) into Sm(σ)=S(σ)∩[mn+1,mn+n]S_m(\sigma) = S(\sigma) \cap [mn + 1, mn + n], where mm runs through the integers; of course, Sm(σ)S_m(\sigma) is empty if mm is negative or m>(n−1)/2m > (n-1)/2, and ∣S0(σ)∣≥n|S_0(\sigma)| \ge n.
Leaving aside the trivial cases n=1n=1 and n=2n=2, we assume n≥3n \ge 3 and prove that
∣Sm(σ)∣+∣Sm−1(σ)∣>2n,(∗) |S_m(\sigma)| + |S_{m-1}(\sigma)| > \sqrt{2n}, \quad (*)
for every non-negative integer m≤(n+1)/4m \le (n+1)/4. The conclusion then follows by summing over this range:
∣S(σ)∣≥12∑m=0⌊(n+1)/4⌋(∣Sm(σ)∣+∣Sm−1(σ)∣)>12⌊n+54⌋2n>nn42. |S(\sigma)| \ge \frac{1}{2} \sum_{m=0}^{\lfloor(n+1)/4\rfloor} (|S_m(\sigma)| + |S_{m-1}(\sigma)|) > \frac{1}{2} \left\lfloor \frac{n+5}{4} \right\rfloor \sqrt{2n} > \frac{n\sqrt{n}}{4\sqrt{2}}.
To prove (*), fix a non-negative integer m≤(n+1)/4m \le (n+1)/4. We will show that the Minkowski difference Sm(σ)−(Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ))S_m(\sigma) - (S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma)) contains every positive integer less than or equal to nn; alternatively, but equivalently, that it contains every σ(k)\sigma(k). Then so does (Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ))−(Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ))(S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma)) - (S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma)), so ∣Sm(σ)∣+∣Sm−1(σ)∣=∣Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ)∣>2n|S_m(\sigma)| + |S_{m-1}(\sigma)| = |S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma)| > \sqrt{2n}, for if XX is a finite set of numbers such that {1,2,…,n}⊆X−X\{1, 2, \dots, n\} \subseteq X - X, then ∣X∣⋅(∣X∣−1)+1≥∣X−X∣≥2n+1|X| \cdot (|X| - 1) + 1 \ge |X - X| \ge 2n + 1, so ∣X∣≥(1+8n+1)/2>2n|X| \ge (1 + \sqrt{8n+1})/2 > \sqrt{2n}.
Finally, we show that every σ(k)\sigma(k) is a member of Sm(σ)−(Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ))S_m(\sigma) - (S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma)). To this end, fix a positive integer k≤nk \le n, and notice that at least one of the sums ∑i=1kσ(i)\sum_{i=1}^k \sigma(i), ∑i=knσ(i)\sum_{i=k}^n \sigma(i) exceeds n(n+1)/4≥mnn(n+1)/4 \ge mn. Let ∑i=knσ(i)>mn\sum_{i=k}^n \sigma(i) > mn — the other case is easily dealt with dually —, and consider the smallest integer ℓ≥k\ell \ge k such that ∑i=kℓσ(i)>mn\sum_{i=k}^{\ell} \sigma(i) > mn. With reference to this minimality, it is readily checked that the sums ∑i=kℓσ(i)\sum_{i=k}^{\ell} \sigma(i) and ∑i=k+1ℓσ(i)\sum_{i=k+1}^{\ell} \sigma(i) belong to Sm(σ)S_m(\sigma) and Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ)S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma), respectively, so σ(k)\sigma(k) is indeed a member of Sm(σ)−(Sm(σ)∪Sm−1(σ))S_m(\sigma) - (S_m(\sigma) \cup S_{m-1}(\sigma)).

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.