Let α=∠DAB. Since ∣AD∣=∣BD∣, we also have ∠ABD=α. By the inscribed angle theorem, we find ∠ACD=α, while the cyclic quadrilateral theorem gives ∠BCD=180∘−α. Therefore, ∠BCA=180∘−2α. The angle sum in triangle BIM gives, together with the fact that I is the intersection of the angle bisectors of △BCM, that
∠BIM=180∘−∠IMB−∠MBI=90∘+90∘−21∠CMB−21∠MBC=90∘+21∠BCM=90∘+21∠BCA=90∘+90∘−α=180∘−α.
Since BIMN is a cyclic quadrilateral, it follows that ∠BNM=α. The angle sum in △BNC now gives
∠NBC=180∘−∠BCN−∠CNB=180∘−∠BCA−∠MNB=180∘−(180∘−2α)−α=α.
This means that
∠ABN=∠ABC−∠NBC=∠ABC−α=∠ABC−∠ABD=∠CBD.
Combined with ∠NAB=∠CAB=∠CDB, which holds by the inscribed angle theorem, we get △ABN∼△DBC (AA). Therefore,
∣CD∣∣AN∣=∣CB∣∣BN∣
or ∣CD∣⋅∣BN∣=∣AN∣⋅∣CB∣. We know that ∠NBC=α=∠BNM=∠BNC, so △BNC is isosceles with vertex angle C, thus ∣CB∣=∣CN∣. Therefore, ∣CD∣⋅∣BN∣= ∣AN∣⋅∣CN∣, which is what we wanted to prove.