The second root is negative, while ak+1 is positive, so
ak+1=2−Sk+Sk2+4 and thus Sk+1=Sk+ak+1=2Sk+Sk2+4.
From the induction hypothesis (4), we have
2k+k+4≤Sk+1≤22k−1+2k+3
We will show that (k+k+4)/2≥k+1, which implies the left side of the statement: k+1≤Sk. Indeed, multiplying by 2 and squaring both sides, we get:
2k+4+2k(k+4)≥4k+4, which is true because k(k+4)≥k.
Similarly, the other inequality to be proven follows if we show that
22k−1+2k+3≤2k+1
Again, multiplying by 2 and squaring both sides, we get:
4k+2+24k2+4k−3≤8k+4
which is true because
4k2+4k−3≤4k2+4k+1=2k+1
Thus, we have shown that
k+1≤Sk+1≤2k+1=2(k+1)−1
and we have proven the statement.
II. Solution. Let bn=(an1)2. We will show that
n≤bn≤2n−1
Write equation (1) for two consecutive indices:
a1+a2+…+ak+ak+1=ak+11,a1+a2+…+ak=ak1
and subtract the second from the first:
ak+1=ak+11−ak1
From this, express 1/ak:
ak1=ak+11−ak+1
and square both sides:
(ak1)2=(ak+11)2+ak+12−2, or bk=bk+1+ak+12−2
Since
ak+11=a1+…+ak+1>ak+1, it follows that 1>ak+12
From this, we get
bk+1−bk=2−ak+12>1 follows.
Finally, since b1=1,
bn=(bn−bn−1)+(bn−1−bn−2)+…+(b2−b1)+b1≥(n−1)⋅1+1=n and bn=(bn−bn−1)+(bn−1−bn−2)+…+(b2−b1)+b1≤(n−1)⋅2+1=2n−1
Thus, we have proven the statement.
## III. Solution.
Multiplying (1) by an:
a1an+a2an+…+an2=1
Write this for n=1,2,…,k and sum the resulting equations:
!
Since
ak21=(a1+…+ak)2=n=1∑kan2+2n<m∑anam, it follows that ak21≥n=1∑kan2+n<m∑anam=k and ak21=2(n=1∑kan2+n<m∑anam)−n=1∑kan2=2k−n=1∑kan2≥2k−a12=2k−1
Thus, k≤1/ak2≤2k−1, from which the statement follows immediately.
Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track
puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.