Since x,y,z are distinct positive integers, the required inequality is symmetric and WLOG we can suppose that x≥y+1≥z+2. We consider 2 possible cases:
Case 1. y≥z+2. Since x≥y+1≥z+3 it follows that
(x−y)2≥1,(y−z)2≥4,(x−z)2≥9
which are equivalent to
x2+y2≥2xy+1,y2+z2≥2yz+4,x2+z2≥2xz+9
or otherwise
zx2+zy2≥2xyz+z,xy2+xz2≥2xyz+4x,yx2+yz2≥2xyz+9y
Adding up the last three inequalities we have
xy(x+y)+yz(y+z)+zx(z+x)≥6xyz+4x+9y+z
which implies that (x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx−2)≥9xyz+2x+7y−z.
Since x≥z+3 it follows that 2x+7y−z≥0 and our inequality follows.
Case 2. y=z+1. Since x≥y+1=z+2 it follows that x≥z+2, and replacing y=z+1 in the required inequality we have to prove
(x+z+1+z)(x(z+1)+(z+1)z+zx−2)≥9x(z+1)z
which is equivalent to
(x+2z+1)(z2+2zx+z+x−2)−9x(z+1)z≥0
Doing easy algebraic manipulations, this is equivalent to prove
(x−z−2)(x−z+1)(2z+1)≥0
which is satisfied since x≥z+2.
The equality is achieved only in the Case 2 for x=z+2, so we have equality when (x,y,z)= (k+2,k+1,k) and all the permutations for any positive integer k.
## Combinatorics
The text is already in English, so no translation is needed.