Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / /393 of 520

Number theory Difficulty 7.3 National olympiad, round 2 Prove it

Let p p be prime. Denote by N(p) N (p) the number of integers x x for which 1xp 1 \leq x \leq p and
xx1(modp) x ^ {x} \equiv 1 \quad (\bmod p) Prove that there exist numbers c<1/2 c <1/2 and p0>0 p_ {0}> 0 such that
N(p)pc N (p) \leq p ^ {c} if pp0 p \ge p_ {0} .

Solution

1. Define the problem and notation:
Let p p be a prime number. We denote by N(p) N(p) the number of integers x x such that 1xp 1 \leq x \leq p and xx1(modp) x^x \equiv 1 \pmod{p} . We aim to prove that there exist constants c<12 c < \frac{1}{2} and p0>0 p_0 > 0 such that N(p)pc N(p) \leq p^c for all pp0 p \geq p_0 .

2. Divisors and sets:
For each divisor d d of p1 p-1 , let Ad A_d be the set of integers 1xp 1 \leq x \leq p such that gcd(x,p1)=d \gcd(x, p-1) = d and xx1(modp) x^x \equiv 1 \pmod{p} . This condition implies that x x is an e e -th power modulo p p , where e=p1d e = \frac{p-1}{d} .

3. Summing over divisors:
We have:
N(p)=dp1Ad N(p) = \sum_{d \mid p-1} |A_d|
Note that Admin(d,e) |A_d| \leq \min(d, e) , so Adp1 |A_d| \leq \sqrt{p-1} . Therefore:
N(p)dp1p1 N(p) \leq \sum_{d \mid p-1} \sqrt{p-1}
Since the number of divisors τ(n) \tau(n) of n n satisfies τ(n)nε \tau(n) \ll n^\varepsilon for any ε>0 \varepsilon > 0 , we get:
N(p)p1/2τ(p1)p1/2+ε N(p) \leq p^{1/2} \cdot \tau(p-1) \ll p^{1/2 + \varepsilon}
for any ε>0 \varepsilon > 0 .

4. Improving the bound:
To improve the bound, we need a good estimate for Ad |A_d| when dep1/2 d \approx e \approx p^{1/2} . This is where the sum-product theorem over finite fields is useful.

5. Sum-product theorem application:
The sumset Ad+Ad A_d + A_d is contained in the set of multiples of d d within {1,2,,2p1} \{1, 2, \ldots, 2p-1\} , so:
Ad+Ad2e |A_d + A_d| \leq 2e
Similarly, the product set AdAd A_d \cdot A_d is contained in the set of e e -th powers in Fp× \mathbb{F}_p^\times , so:
AdAdd |A_d \cdot A_d| \leq d
Hence:
max(Ad+Ad,AdAd)2max(d,e) \max(|A_d + A_d|, |A_d \cdot A_d|) \leq 2 \max(d, e)
By the sum-product theorem, the left-hand side is at least Ad54ε |A_d|^{\frac{5}{4} - \varepsilon} , implying:
Ad54ε2max(d,e) |A_d|^{\frac{5}{4} - \varepsilon} \leq 2 \max(d, e)
Therefore:
Admax(d,e)45+ε |A_d| \ll \max(d, e)^{\frac{4}{5} + \varepsilon}

6. **Bounding Ad |A_d| :**
For min(d,e)p4/9 \min(d, e) \ll p^{4/9} , we use the original bound to get Adp4/9 |A_d| \ll p^{4/9} . Otherwise, if d,ep5/9 d, e \ll p^{5/9} , we get:
Adp4/9+ε |A_d| \ll p^{4/9 + \varepsilon}

7. **Final bound for N(p) N(p) :**
Summarizing, we have shown that:
N(p)p4/9+ε N(p) \ll p^{4/9 + \varepsilon}
Hence, any c>49 c > \frac{4}{9} is admissible. This shows that there exist constants c<12 c < \frac{1}{2} and p0>0 p_0 > 0 such that N(p)pc N(p) \leq p^c for pp0 p \geq p_0 .

\blacksquare

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: NuminaMath-1.5, licensed Apache-2.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.