Number theoryDifficulty 7.3National olympiad, round 2Prove it
Let p be prime. Denote by N(p) the number of integers x for which 1≤x≤p and xx≡1(modp)Prove that there exist numbers c<1/2 and p0>0 such that N(p)≤pcif p≥p0.
Solution
1. Define the problem and notation: Let p be a prime number. We denote by N(p) the number of integers x such that 1≤x≤p and xx≡1(modp). We aim to prove that there exist constants c<21 and p0>0 such that N(p)≤pc for all p≥p0.
2. Divisors and sets: For each divisor d of p−1, let Ad be the set of integers 1≤x≤p such that gcd(x,p−1)=d and xx≡1(modp). This condition implies that x is an e-th power modulo p, where e=dp−1.
3. Summing over divisors: We have: N(p)=d∣p−1∑∣Ad∣ Note that ∣Ad∣≤min(d,e), so ∣Ad∣≤p−1. Therefore: N(p)≤d∣p−1∑p−1 Since the number of divisors τ(n) of n satisfies τ(n)≪nε for any ε>0, we get: N(p)≤p1/2⋅τ(p−1)≪p1/2+ε for any ε>0.
4. Improving the bound: To improve the bound, we need a good estimate for ∣Ad∣ when d≈e≈p1/2. This is where the sum-product theorem over finite fields is useful.
5. Sum-product theorem application: The sumset Ad+Ad is contained in the set of multiples of d within {1,2,…,2p−1}, so: ∣Ad+Ad∣≤2e Similarly, the product set Ad⋅Ad is contained in the set of e-th powers in Fp×, so: ∣Ad⋅Ad∣≤d Hence: max(∣Ad+Ad∣,∣Ad⋅Ad∣)≤2max(d,e) By the sum-product theorem, the left-hand side is at least ∣Ad∣45−ε, implying: ∣Ad∣45−ε≤2max(d,e) Therefore: ∣Ad∣≪max(d,e)54+ε
6. **Bounding ∣Ad∣:** For min(d,e)≪p4/9, we use the original bound to get ∣Ad∣≪p4/9. Otherwise, if d,e≪p5/9, we get: ∣Ad∣≪p4/9+ε
7. **Final bound for N(p):** Summarizing, we have shown that: N(p)≪p4/9+ε Hence, any c>94 is admissible. This shows that there exist constants c<21 and p0>0 such that N(p)≤pc for p≥p0.
■
Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track
puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.