To determine whether there exists a positive integer k such that p=6k+1 is a prime and
(k3k)≡1(modp),
we proceed as follows:
Let g be a primitive root modulo p. By definition, g6k≡1(modp). For any integer a such that p∤a, by Fermat's Little Theorem, we have a6k≡1(modp). Therefore, a3k≡−1,0, or 1(modp).
Since g is a primitive root modulo p, the set {g,g2,…,g6k} is equivalent to {1,2,…,6k}.
Consider the sum
A=i=1∑k(g6i+1)3k.
This sum can only take values in the set {−k,−k+1,…,k−1,k}(modp).
Expanding A and arranging by binomial coefficients, we get:
A=j=0∑3k(j3k)[(g6j)k−1+(g6k)k−2+⋯+1].
For j=0,k,2k,3k, we have (g6j)k−1+(g6k)k−2+⋯+1≡0(modp) because (g6j)k−1≡0(modp).
Thus,
A≡k((03k)+(k3k)+(2k3k)+(3k3k))(modp).
If there exists a prime p=6k+1 such that (k3k)≡1(modp), then
A≡4k(modp).
However, this contradicts the earlier result that A must be in the set {−k,−k+1,…,k−1,k}(modp). Therefore, there is no such prime p.
The answer is: \boxed{\text{No, there does not exist such a prime } p.}