Let be a randomly chosen 6-element subset of the set . Consider the polynomial . Let be the probability that is divisible by some nonconstant polynomial of degree at most 3 with integer coefficients satisfying . Find the limit of as goes to infinity.
Problem 1730
Official solution
Solution:
We begin with the following claims:
Claim 1: There are finitely many that divide some of the given form.
Proof: First of all the leading coefficient of must be 1, because if divides then must have integer coefficients too. Note that if with elements in increasing order, then
So all the roots of must have magnitude less than 2, and so do all the roots of . Therefore, all the symmetric expressions involving the roots of are also bounded, so by Vieta's Theorem all the coefficients of of a given degree are bounded, and the number of such is therefore finite.
Claim 2: If has a nonzero root that does not have magnitude 1, then the probability that it divides a randomly chosen vanishes as goes to infinity.
Proof: WLOG suppose that has a root with (similar argument will apply for ). Then from the bound given in the proof of Claim 1, it is not difficult to see that is bounded since
which approaches infinity as goes to infinity. By similar argument we can show that are all bounded. Therefore, the probability of choosing the correct coefficients is bounded above by the product of five fixed numbers divided by , which vanishes as goes to infinity.
From the claims above, we see that we only need to consider polynomials with roots of magnitude 1, since the sum of all other possibilities vanishes as goes to infinity. Moreover, this implies that we only need to consider roots of unity. Since has degree at most 3, the only possible roots are , corresponding to (note that eighth root of unity is impossible because cannot be factored in the rationals).
Now we compute the probability of for each possible root . Since the value of cycles with , and we only care about , we may even assume that the exponents are chosen independently at random, with repetition allowed.
Case 1: When , the number of odd exponents need to be equal to the number of even exponents, which happens with probability .
Case 2: When , the number of exponents that are 0 modulo 4 need to be equal to those that are 2 modulo 4, and same for 1 modulo 4 and 3 modulo 4, which happens with probability .
Note that Case 1 and Case 2 have no overlaps, since the former requires 3 even exponents, and the latter requires 0, 2, 4, or 6 even exponents.
Case 3: When , the number of exponents that are modulo 3 need to be equal to each other, so the probability is .
Case 4: When , then if is the number of exponents that are modulo (), then for some . Since , must be one of . When , we have , which is the same as Case 1. When , we have , which is covered in Case 3, and similar for . Therefore we do not need to consider this case.
Now we deal with over-counting. Since Case 1 and 2 deal with the exponents modulo 4 and Case 3 deal with exponents modulo 3, the probabilities are independent from each other. So by complementary counting, we compute the final probability as