Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 8 / 67 of 180 #2407 of 2604

Problem 2407

IMO Shortlist mid-range; USAMO P2/P5
Number theory Difficulty 8.2 Prove it China-TST-A · China

Given a positive integer n≥4n \ge 4, prove that the equation
(2x−1)(5x−1)=yn (2^x - 1)(5^x - 1) = y^n
has no positive integer solutions (x,y)(x, y).

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solution

We will use the well-known Lifting the Exponent Lemma (LTE), stated as follows:
Lifting the Exponent Lemma: Let pp be a prime and mm a positive integer. Let a,ba, b be integers such that p∤abp \nmid ab and qp∣(a−b)q_p \mid (a-b), where qp=pq_p = p when pp is odd and q2=4q_2 = 4 when p=2p = 2. Then we have
vp(am−bm)=vp(a−b)+vp(m). v_p(a^m - b^m) = v_p(a - b) + v_p(m).

Assume there exist positive integers x,yx, y satisfying (2x−1)(5x−1)=yn(2^x - 1)(5^x - 1) = y^n. We first prove the following lemma:
Lemma: We have 2⋅3⋅5⋅7∣x2 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \mid x, and for any prime p≤np \le n,
vp(x)≥⌊log⁡pn⌋. v_p(x) \ge \lfloor \log_p n \rfloor.

Proof of Lemma: From 2∣(5x−1)2 \mid (5^x - 1) we get 2∣y2 \mid y. By LTE:
n≤nv2(y)=v2((2x−1)(5x−1))=v2(5−1)+v2(x). \begin{aligned} n \le nv_2(y) &= v_2((2^x - 1)(5^x - 1)) \\ &= v_2(5 - 1) + v_2(x). \end{aligned}
Thus v2(x)≥n−2≥⌊log⁡2n⌋v_2(x) \ge n - 2 \ge \lfloor \log_2 n \rfloor. In particular, 4∣x4 \mid x, so 3⋅5∣2x−13 \cdot 5 \mid 2^x - 1, hence 3⋅5∣y3 \cdot 5 \mid y. By LTE:
n≤nv3(y)=v3(((22)x2−1)((52)x2−1))=v3(22−1)+v3(x2)+v3(52−1)+v3(x2)=2v3(x)+2;n≤nv5(y)=v5(((24)x4−1)(5x−1))=v5(24−1)+v5(x4)=v5(x)+1. \begin{aligned} n \le nv_3(y) &= v_3(((2^2)^{\frac{x}{2}} - 1)((5^2)^{\frac{x}{2}} - 1)) \\ &= v_3(2^2 - 1) + v_3(\frac{x}{2}) + v_3(5^2 - 1) + v_3(\frac{x}{2}) = 2v_3(x) + 2; \\ n \le nv_5(y) &= v_5(((2^4)^{\frac{x}{4}} - 1)(5^x - 1)) \\ &= v_5(2^4 - 1) + v_5(\frac{x}{4}) = v_5(x) + 1. \end{aligned}
Thus v3(x)≥(n−2)/2≥⌊log⁡3n⌋v_3(x) \ge (n - 2)/2 \ge \lfloor \log_3 n \rfloor, and v5(x)≥n−1≥⌊log⁡5n⌋v_5(x) \ge n - 1 \ge \lfloor \log_5 n \rfloor. In particular, 3∣x3 \mid x. Combined with 2∣x2 \mid x, we have 6∣x6 \mid x, so 7∣(2x−1)7 \mid (2^x - 1), hence 7∣y7 \mid y. By LTE:
n≤nv7(y)=v7(((26)x6−1)((56)x6−1))=v7(26−1)+v7(x6)+v7(56−1)+v7(x6)=2v7(x)+2. \begin{aligned} n \le nv_7(y) &= v_7(((2^6)^{\frac{x}{6}} - 1)((5^6)^{\frac{x}{6}} - 1)) \\ &= v_7(2^6 - 1) + v_7(\frac{x}{6}) + v_7(5^6 - 1) + v_7(\frac{x}{6}) = 2v_7(x) + 2. \end{aligned}
Thus v7(x)≥(n−2)/2≥⌊log⁡7n⌋v_7(x) \ge (n - 2)/2 \ge \lfloor \log_7 n \rfloor.

If n≤10n \le 10, the lemma is already proved. Now assume n≥11n \ge 11. We proceed by induction on pp. Let pp be a prime with 11≤p≤n11 \le p \le n, and assume the lemma holds for all primes q<pq < p. By induction hypothesis, for any prime q≤p−1q \le p-1,
vq(x)≥⌊log⁡qn⌋≥⌊log⁡q(p−1)⌋≥vq(p−1). v_q(x) \ge \lfloor \log_q n \rfloor \ge \lfloor \log_q (p-1) \rfloor \ge v_q(p-1).
Thus (p−1)∣x(p-1) \mid x. By Fermat's Little Theorem, p∣(2p−1−1)p \mid (2^{p-1}-1) and p∣(5p−1−1)p \mid (5^{p-1}-1). Hence p∣(2x−1)p \mid (2^x - 1) and p∣yp \mid y. By LTE:
n≤nvp(y)=vp(((2p−1)xp−1−1)((5p−1)xp−1−1))=vp(2p−1−1)+vp(xp−1)+vp(5p−1−1)+vp(xp−1)=2vp(x)+vp(2p−1−1)+vp(5p−1−1)<2vp(x)+log⁡p(2p−1)+log⁡p(5p−1)<2vp(x)+plog⁡p(10). \begin{align*} n \le nv_p(y) &= v_p\left(((2^{p-1})^{\frac{x}{p-1}} - 1)((5^{p-1})^{\frac{x}{p-1}} - 1)\right) \\ &= v_p(2^{p-1} - 1) + v_p\left(\frac{x}{p-1}\right) + v_p(5^{p-1} - 1) + v_p\left(\frac{x}{p-1}\right) \\ &= 2v_p(x) + v_p(2^{p-1} - 1) + v_p(5^{p-1} - 1) \\ &< 2v_p(x) + \log_p(2^{p-1}) + \log_p(5^{p-1}) \\ &< 2v_p(x) + p \log_p(10). \end{align*}
Therefore,
vp(x)>n−plog⁡p(10)2. v_p(x) > \frac{n - p \log_p(10)}{2}.
Since 11≤p≤n11 \le p \le n, this implies vp(x)>0v_p(x) > 0, so vp(x)≥1v_p(x) \ge 1. If n<p2n < p^2, then vp(x)≥1≥⌊log⁡pn⌋v_p(x) \ge 1 \ge \lfloor \log_p n \rfloor. To complete the induction, we only need to prove for n≥p2≥112n \ge p^2 \ge 11^2 that
n−plog⁡p(10)2>log⁡pn. \frac{n - p \log_p(10)}{2} > \log_p n.
This is equivalent to
pn10p>n2. \frac{p^n}{10^p} > n^2.
Indeed, using n≥p2≥112n \ge p^2 \ge 11^2, we have
pn10p=pp10p⋅pn−p>11n−n>9n2>n2. \frac{p^n}{10^p} = \frac{p^p}{10^p} \cdot p^{n-p} > 11^{n-\sqrt{n}} > 9^{\frac{n}{2}} > n^2.
This completes the induction. The lemma is proved.

Proof of the Main Result: By the lemma, for any prime p≤np \le n,
vp(x)≥⌊log⁡pn⌋≥vp(n). v_p(x) \ge \lfloor \log_p n \rfloor \ge v_p(n).
Thus n∣xn \mid x. Let x=nx1x = nx_1, then
yn=(2x−1)(5x−1)<(10x1)n. y^n = (2^x - 1)(5^x - 1) < (10^{x_1})^n.
Hence 10x1≥y+110^{x_1} \ge y + 1. Therefore,
yn=(10x1)n−2x−5x+1≥(y+1)n−2x−5x+1>yn+n⋅yn−1−2⋅5x≥yn+4⋅y3n4−2⋅5x. \begin{align*} y^n &= (10^{x_1})^n - 2^x - 5^x + 1 \\ &\ge (y+1)^n - 2^x - 5^x + 1 \\ &> y^n + n \cdot y^{n-1} - 2 \cdot 5^x \\ &\ge y^n + 4 \cdot y^{\frac{3n}{4}} - 2 \cdot 5^x. \end{align*}

This implies y3n4<5xy^{\frac{3n}{4}} < 5^x, i.e., yn<54x3y^n < 5^{\frac{4x}{3}}. On the other hand, by the lemma we have x≥2⋅3⋅5⋅7x \ge 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7, so
yn=(2x−1)(5x−1)>(0.9⋅2x)⋅(0.9⋅5x)>0.8⋅52x5⋅5x>54x3, y^n = (2^x - 1)(5^x - 1) > (0.9 \cdot 2^x) \cdot (0.9 \cdot 5^x) > 0.8 \cdot 5^{\frac{2x}{5}} \cdot 5^x > 5^{\frac{4x}{3}},
a contradiction.
Therefore, the original Diophantine equation has no positive integer solutions. □\square

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.