Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 8 / 58 of 180 #2398 of 2604

Problem 2398

IMO Shortlist mid-range; USAMO P2/P5
Geometry Difficulty 8.2 Prove it USA IMO · United States

Let △ABC\triangle ABC be an acute-angled triangle with OO as its circumcenter. Let PP on line BCBC be the foot of the altitude from AA. Assume that ∠BCA≥∠ABC+30∘\angle BCA \ge \angle ABC + 30^\circ. Prove that ∠CAB+∠COP<90∘\angle CAB + \angle COP < 90^\circ.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solution

First Solution. (By Gabriel Carroll and Tiankai Liu) Because ∠AOC=2β\angle AOC = 2\beta, we have ∠CAO=90∘−β\angle CAO = 90^\circ - \beta. Note that in right triangle APCAPC, ∠CAP=90∘−γ\angle CAP = 90^\circ - \gamma, so
∠PAO=∠CAO−∠CAP=γ−β. \begin{aligned} \angle PAO &= \angle CAO - \angle CAP \\ &= \gamma - \beta. \end{aligned}
By (1), sin⁡∠PAO≥12\sin \angle PAO \ge \frac{1}{2}.
Figure 1
Let NN be the foot of perpendicular from OO to segment APAP. Then MPNOMPNO is a rectangle, so
MPOA=ONOA=sin⁡∠PAO≥12, \begin{aligned} \frac{MP}{OA} &= \frac{ON}{OA} \\ &= \sin \angle PAO \\ &\ge \frac{1}{2}, \end{aligned}
or 2MP≥OA=OC2MP \ge OA = OC. In right triangles OCMOCM and OPMOPM, OC>CMOC > CM and OP>MPOP > MP. Therefore,
PC−MP=MC−2MP≤MC−OC<MC−MC=0. \begin{aligned} PC - MP &= MC - 2MP \\ &\le MC - OC \\ &< MC - MC \\ &= 0. \end{aligned}
We obtain OP>MP>PCOP > MP > PC, as desired.

Second Solution.
Figure 2
Let KK and QQ be the reflections of AA and PP, respectively, across line OMOM. Then KQPAKQPA is a rectangle and QP=KAQP = KA. Note that
∠KOA=∠BOA−∠BOK=∠BOA−∠COA=2γ−2β≥60∘. \begin{aligned} \angle KOA &= \angle BOA - \angle BOK = \angle BOA - \angle COA \\ &= 2\gamma - 2\beta \ge 60^\circ. \end{aligned}
Because KK and AA are reflections of each other across line OMOM, we have OK=OAOK = OA and thus KK lies on ω\omega. Hence, QP=KA=2Rsin⁡(12∠KOA)≥RQP = KA = 2R \sin(\frac{1}{2}\angle KOA) \ge R. By the Triangle Inequality, we have
OP+R=Q+OC>QC=QP+PC≥R+PC, \begin{aligned} OP + R &= Q + OC > QC \\ &= QP + PC \ge R + PC, \end{aligned}
which implies (*).

Third Solution. By (1) and the Product-to-Sum formulas,
4sin⁡βcos⁡γ=2[sin⁡(γ+β)−sin⁡(γ−β)]=2sin⁡α−2sin⁡(γ−β)<2−1=1. \begin{aligned} 4 \sin \beta \cos \gamma &= 2[\sin(\gamma + \beta) - \sin(\gamma - \beta)] \\ &= 2 \sin \alpha - 2 \sin(\gamma - \beta) < 2 - 1 = 1. \end{aligned}
Applying the Extended Law of Sines gives
CP⋅CB=(ACcos⁡γ)(CB)=(2Rsin⁡βcos⁡γ)(2Rsin⁡α)<R2.(2) CP \cdot CB = (AC \cos \gamma)(CB) = (2R \sin \beta \cos \gamma)(2R \sin \alpha) < R^2. \quad (2)
We present two proofs of (*) based on (2).
---
* We choose a point JJ on ray CBCB so that CJ⋅CP=R2CJ \cdot CP = R^2. It follows from this equation and from (2) that CJ>CBCJ > CB, so that ∠OBC>∠OJC\angle OBC > \angle OJC. Since OC/CJ=PC/COOC/CJ = PC/CO and ∠JCO=∠PCO\angle JCO = \angle PCO, triangles JCOJCO and OCPOCP are similar and ∠OJC=∠COP\angle OJC = \angle COP. It follows that
∠COP=∠OJC<∠OBC=90∘−∠BAC, \begin{aligned} \angle COP &= \angle OJC < \angle OBC \\ &= 90^\circ - \angle BAC, \end{aligned}
or ∠CAB+∠COP<90∘\angle CAB + \angle COP < 90^\circ.
* The power of PP with respect to circle ω\omega is BP⋅PC=R2−OP2BP \cdot PC = R^2 - OP^2. By (2), we obtain
OP2=R2−BP⋅PC>PC⋅CB−BP⋅PC=PC2. \begin{aligned} OP^2 &= R^2 - BP \cdot PC \\ &> PC \cdot CB - BP \cdot PC \\ &= PC^2. \end{aligned}
Thus, OP>PCOP > PC, as desired.

Fourth Solution. By the Extended Law of Sines, AB=2Rsin⁡γAB = 2R \sin \gamma and AC=2Rsin⁡βAC = 2R \sin \beta. Therefore, by (1) and the Addition and Subtraction formulas, we obtain
BP−PC=ABcos⁡β−ACcos⁡γ=2R(sin⁡γcos⁡β−sin⁡βcos⁡γ)=2Rsin⁡(γ−β)≥R. \begin{aligned} BP - PC &= AB \cos \beta - AC \cos \gamma \\ &= 2R(\sin \gamma \cos \beta - \sin \beta \cos \gamma) \\ &= 2R \sin(\gamma - \beta) \geq R. \end{aligned}
By the Triangle inequality,
R+OP=BO+OP>BP≥R+PC, R + OP = BO + OP > BP \geq R + PC,
which implies that OP>CPOP > CP, as desired.

Fifth Solution. (By Zhiqiang Zhang, China) By the Extended Law of Sines and the Product-to-Sum formulas, we have
CP=ACcos⁡γ=2Rsin⁡βcos⁡γ=R(sin⁡(β+γ)−sin⁡(γ−β))<R(1−sin⁡30∘)=OC2, \begin{aligned} CP &= AC \cos \gamma = 2R \sin \beta \cos \gamma \\ &= R(\sin(\beta + \gamma) - \sin(\gamma - \beta)) \\ &< R(1 - \sin 30^\circ) = \frac{OC}{2}, \end{aligned}
or 2CP<OC2CP < OC. On the other hand, applying the Law of Cosines in triangle COPCOP yields
CP2+OC2−2(CP)(OC)cos⁡∠OCB=OP2. CP^2 + OC^2 - 2(CP)(OC) \cos \angle OCB = OP^2.
Now (*) follows from the inequality
OP2>CP2+OC2−OC⋅OC⋅1=CP2. OP^2 > CP^2 + OC^2 - OC \cdot OC \cdot 1 = CP^2.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.