Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 7 / 221 of 300 #2261 of 2604

Problem 2261

National Olympiad second round; IMO P1/P4
Combinatorics Difficulty 7.6 Prove it Brazilian Mathematical Olympiad · Brazil

Two mathematicians, lost in Berlin, arrived on the corner of Barbarossa street with Martin Luther street and need to arrive on the corner of Meininger street with Martin Luther street. Unfortunately they don't know which direction to go along Martin Luther Street to reach Meininger Street nor how far it is, so they must go forwards and backwards along Martin Luther street until they arrive at their destination. What is the smallest value for a positive integer KK so that they can be sure that if there are NN blocks between Barbarossa street and Meininger street then they can arrive at their destination by walking no more than KNKN blocks (no matter what NN turns out to be)? The mathematicians always walk together.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solution

Since the mathematicians didn't know which side and at what distance their destination was, they should adopt the following strategy: walk a1a_1 blocks on one side (say, left), then go back to the starting point and walk a2a_2 blocks to the right, then go back again and walk a3a_3 blocks to the left, and so on, with a1<a3<a5<…a_1 < a_3 < a_5 < \dots and a2<a4<a6<…a_2 < a_4 < a_6 < \dots until they find their destination. The worst cases happen when the destination is a2k+1+1a_{2k+1} + 1 blocks to the left or a2k+1a_{2k} + 1 blocks to the right.
In these cases, there are an+1a_n + 1 blocks between the starting point and the destination and the mathematicians walk a total of 2a1+2a2+⋯+2an+2an+1+an+12a_1 + 2a_2 + \dots + 2a_n + 2a_{n+1} + a_n + 1 blocks until they reach their destination. So 2a1+2a2+⋯+2an+2an+1+an≤k(an+1)2a_1 + 2a_2 + \dots + 2a_n + 2a_{n+1} + a_n \le k(a_n + 1) or sn+1≤(k−12)(an+1)s_{n+1} \le \left(\frac{k-1}{2}\right)(a_n + 1) for all naturals nn, where st=a1+a2+⋯+ats_t = a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_t.
For k=9k=9 there are strategies satisfying the conditions of the problem: for example, consider am=2ma_m = 2^m. Notice that sn+1=21+22+⋯+2n+1=2n+2−2<4(2n+1)=(k−12)(an+1)s_{n+1} = 2^1 + 2^2 + \dots + 2^{n+1} = 2^{n+2} - 2 < 4(2^n + 1) = \left(\frac{k-1}{2}\right)(a_n + 1) for all naturals nn.
Now we prove that kk cannot be less than 9. If k<9k < 9 then c=k−12<4c = \frac{k-1}{2} < 4. Since an=sn−sn−1a_n = s_n - s_{n-1} we have sn+1≤c(sn−sn−1+1)s_{n+1} \le c(s_n - s_{n-1} + 1) for all naturals nn. Let un=sn−cu_n = s_n - c so that un+1≤c(un−un−1)u_{n+1} \le c(u_n - u_{n-1}). Since c<4c < 4, un>0u_n > 0 for all n≥3n \ge 3 and if vn=un+1unv_n = \frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n} for n≥3n \ge 3, vn≤c(1−1vn−1)v_n \le c\left(1 - \frac{1}{v_{n-1}}\right) for all n≥4n \ge 4 and vn−vn−1≤c(1−1vn−1)−vn−1=cvn−1−c−vn−12−1vn−1=c2/4−c−(c/2−vn−1)2vn−1≤c(c−4)4vn−1<0v_n - v_{n-1} \le c\left(1 - \frac{1}{v_{n-1}}\right) - v_{n-1} = \frac{cv_{n-1} - c - v_{n-1}^2 - 1}{v_{n-1}} = \frac{c^2/4 - c - (c/2 - v_{n-1})^2}{v_{n-1}} \le \frac{c(c-4)}{4v_{n-1}} < 0, from which vn<vn−1v_n < v_{n-1} for all n≥4n \ge 4. On the other hand, for all n≥4n \ge 4 we have vn−vn−1≤c(c−4)vn−1  ⟹  vn−vn−1≤c(c−4)4v3v_n - v_{n-1} \le \frac{c(c-4)}{v_{n-1}} \implies v_n - v_{n-1} \le \frac{c(c-4)}{4v_3} for n≥4n \ge 4 and so vn≤v3+(n−3)c(c−4)4v3v_n \le v_3 + \frac{(n-3)c(c-4)}{4v_3} for all n≥4n \ge 4, a contradiction because the right hand side is negative for n>3+4v32c(4−c)n > 3 + \frac{4v_3^2}{c(4-c)}.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.