Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 5 / 256 of 400 #1336 of 2444

Problem 1336

AIME late
Combinatorics Difficulty 5.6 Prove it Berkeley Math Circle Take-Home Contest · United States

Certain cities are connected by roads connecting pairs of them. The roads intersect only at the cities. A subset of the roads is called important if destroying those roads would make it so that there are two cities such that it is impossible to go from the first to the second. A subset SS of the roads is called strategic if it is important and no proper subset of SS is important. Let SS and TT be distinct strategic sets of roads. Let UU be the set of roads that are either in SS or TT, but not both. Prove that UU is important.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solution

Solution:

Let GG be the graph having the cities as its vertices and the roads as its edges. (This just restates the problem in graph-theoretic language, which we use from now on.) We will look at the components of the graph GG and its subgraphs, where a component of a graph is defined to be a maximal connected subset: two vertices are in the same component if and only if it is possible to get from one to the other by following the edges.

The graph GSG-S has more than one component, since it is disconnected. On the other hand, adding one edge of SS to GSG-S can only connect two of these components; if GSG-S had more than two components, adding this edge would still leave a disconnected graph and SS would not be strategic. So GSG-S has exactly two components; call them A,BA, B. Since these components are not connected to each other in GSG-S, every edge of GG connecting AA to BB must lie in SS. Conversely, every edge of SS must connect AA to BB, since, if it were entirely within AA or BB, it could be added to GSG-S while leaving the graph disconnected, and SS would not be strategic. Thus, SS consists exactly of those edges of GG which connect AA to BB. Similarly, GTG-T has two components C,DC, D, and TT consists precisely of the edges of GG which connect CC to DD.

Now, the vertices of GG can be represented as a disjoint union of the four sets of vertices AC,AD,BCA \cap C, A \cap D, B \cap C, and BDB \cap D. From our characterizations of SS and TT, we see that UU consists of precisely those edges of GG which link AA to BB or CC to DD, but not both. It follows that, when we remove UU from GG, all the remaining edges either link neither pair - and therefore lie entirely within one of our four sets of vertices - or both pairs, in which case they connect ACA \cap C to BDB \cap D or ADA \cap D to BCB \cap C. Thus, GUG-U contains no edges connecting the set of vertices (AC)(BD)(A \cap C) \cup (B \cap D) with the vertices (AD)(BC)(A \cap D) \cup (B \cap C). Furthermore, neither set of vertices is empty: we know that all the edges in UU connect these two sets, and UU is nonempty because STS \neq T. So we can choose one vertex from each set, and these two vertices are not connected by any path in GUG-U; thus, UU is important.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.