Three circles , , and intersect in point . Let , , and be the second intersection points (other than ) of and , and , and and , respectively. Assume that lies inside of the triangle . Let lines , , and intersect circles , , and for a second time at points , , and , respectively. If denotes the length of segment , prove that
Problem 2062
Official solution
Solution:
In this solution we will use a method called Inversion in the Plane.
We invert with respect to point with an arbitrary radius . We will label the images of objects (points, circles, lines, segments) under this inversion by putting a bar over them. By properties of inversion, the three given circles through will invert to three lines not through . For instance, circle will invert to a line through points , , and , and similarly for circles and . On the other hand, the original line will invert to itself (as it passes through the center of inversion ); now, points and will move to, perhaps different, points and on this same line, while point will stay where it is (we shall not apply inversion here to the center of inversion ). Analogous situations occur for lines and .

Diagram before inversion
Diagram after inversion, with perpendiculars to
We are ready to describe the new inverted picture. Point is inside triangle . Three points , , and are chosen on the triangle's sides , , and , respectively, so that the three segments , , and all intersect in point (such segments are called cevians in ). Two distance formulas relating new to old distances under inversion tell us:
Dividing these two expressions and canceling and re-expresses one of the desired ratios completely in terms of the new inverted picture:
Now drop perpendiculars and to side as shown in the inverted picture, and call their lengths and . This creates two similar triangles: : they share an angle and have another right angle each. Hence, the ratios of corresponding sides are equal:
where and are the lengths of the drawn altitudes and in and , respectively. Along the way, we multiplied by to recreate the standard formulas for the areas of and , and denoted correspondingly those areas by in the last ratio.
Of course, we can repeat the above discussion for the other two ratios and , and end up rewriting the desired sum in a completely different way:
Here we used the fact that is inside so that the three triangles with vertex , , , and , make up the whole big , and hence their areas add up to the area of this big triangle.